Personally? I don't think there's anything there's anything that justifies his 
reactions and behavior.

He wrote some semi useful code, he didn't discover the missing link, sequence 
the genome, or cure Ebola.

F*%k 'em.

There's enough cases of over-inflated self importance in the world.

On April 3, 2015 11:59:53 PM AKDT, Jon Auer <[email protected]> wrote:
>It's more than just OIDs, adding device support involves a fair amount
>of
>fiddly little things. Finding/cropping icon, regex to match the
>OS/device
>type to handle it correctly, logic to handle the device-specific
>things,
>logic to work around whatever they broke in the MIB (remember when
>Cambium
>returned strings instead of ints for some counters?). Then more
>testing.
>
>That's what makes Observium more useful out of the box than something
>like
>Cacti where you're adding OIDs onesey twosey to device templates.
>
>I think a big part of his reaction is, if you watch IRC, for the past
>few
>months to years there have been people asking for WISP features and
>pretty
>much nobody in a place to write code to do it. My guess is he is time
>constrained and would rather work on other things (hence
>non-responsiveness
>to offers of money) combined with not wanting to deal with what could
>be
>perceived as self-entitled communication from some users.
>
>The hostile reaction to WISP gear:
>CMMMicro is a switch that doesn't even use the switch MIB -> Work done
>to
>support WISP devices doesn't pay off in helping support other
>Enterprise/Wireline devices.
>
>Cambium is extra special because they version the PMP MIB against OS
>rev
>instead of starting out with a well-designed MIB as spec and fixing OS
>to
>match. The easy way out is to ignore that and use the latest but what
>happens when Cambium updates something? Bug reports from users on new
>OS
>complaining that something doesn't work. You update and now there's bug
>reports from the users that want to stay on old OS for a while. The
>hard
>way? Handle every OS rev differently/code gardening responsibility? You
>just can't win.
>
><I digress>
>So, WISP gear, he doesn't need it and doesn't care. I need it and care
>so I
>write what I need. I may not  appreciate the politics of Observium but
>I'm
>being pragmatic. I contributed what little Cambium PMP device support
>there
>is in Observium currently and I have more devices I'd like to see
>supported. If the time comes that my contributions are turned away I'll
>look for another monitoring solution, not out of spite but because I
>need
>to monitor all the things.
>
>There may come a time when I move to LibreNMS. They seem to have
>openness &
>saying yes down but I want to see how they handle saying no to
>extraneous
>things/feature creep beyond monitoring metrics (e.g. if it were me,
>allow/keep rancid integration but just say no to generalized IPAM).
>You can't please everyone and who/how they choose to please will be
>insightful.
></I digress>
>
>On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Do we know why Adam blows up whenever people specify OIDs they want
>to
>> track? I've never bothered to figure it out myself. He made it seem
>like
>> hte OID was such a small part of everything that needed to be done.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Neil Lathwood" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 31, 2015 1:08:23 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] What Adam Armstrong of Observium thinks of
>WISPS
>>
>> On 31 March 2015 at 19:04, WaveDirect <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah you should accept at least equipment donations :)  Some of us
>may
>>> have spares we can part with and after you are done sell them to
>help buy
>>> other products you want to support.
>>>
>>
>> The donation of equipment is a huge ++++. It wouldn't be necessary to
>send
>> the kit anywhere just provide snmp access, that way we can see what
>data is
>> available and work on adding support.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Reply via email to