There was when Performant Networks existed. :( On April 14, 2015 2:24:00 PM AKDT, Sam Lambie <[email protected]> wrote: >We currently have a Dragonwave Dual Mounted 2+0 PTP setup that is Ether >channeled with Cisco switches. Currently each radio link is at 300 >mbps. >Easy to Ether channel as they are the same sized pipe. Once you get >into >links of differing throughput, then Ether Channel will fill up to the >smallest pipe and the rest is wasted. >In the the next month, we are going to install another 2+0 link in the >same >direction that should have up to 1.2 gb aggregate on that link alone. >And >600 mbps on the DW link. So my question is how to essentially bond both >links of differing sizes without wasting wireless throughput. Is there >something better than Ether channel? > > > > >-- >-- >*Sam Lambie* >Taosnet Wireless Tech. >575-758-7598 Office >www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com>
-- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
