First thing that pops into my head is ‘mpls traffic engineering,’ but sounds like you’re looking for straight layer 2.
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Lambie Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 6:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] Ether channel 2 different sized links We currently have a Dragonwave Dual Mounted 2+0 PTP setup that is Ether channeled with Cisco switches. Currently each radio link is at 300 mbps. Easy to Ether channel as they are the same sized pipe. Once you get into links of differing throughput, then Ether Channel will fill up to the smallest pipe and the rest is wasted. In the the next month, we are going to install another 2+0 link in the same direction that should have up to 1.2 gb aggregate on that link alone. And 600 mbps on the DW link. So my question is how to essentially bond both links of differing sizes without wasting wireless throughput. Is there something better than Ether channel? -- -- Sam Lambie Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com>
