if I only had an ATM switch.
On 4/19/2015 12:23 AM, TJ Trout wrote:
Which one?
On Apr 18, 2015 9:07 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
My proposal still stands.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"TJ Trout" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:23:11 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream
I'm not talking about any bgp stuff guys, I'm talking about the
ability to bond several non bgp lines into one virtual pipe that
is bgp capable (i.e. with a mikrotik in a data center who can give
a bgp session) not talking about bonding multiple bgp capable
lines, etc
On Apr 18, 2015 4:54 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
No community support, no business.
http://www.onesc.net/communities/
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:42:08 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream
I have used communities a lot... The problem is non-standard
support and no support at all from some of the transit providers…
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
*Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 3:35 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream
Must not have used communities much? You can exert a lot of
control with them.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 2:32:31 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream
Yeah the inbound part I’m really skeptical over…
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike
Hammett
*Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:43 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream
Through communities, local prefs, etc. and a few upstreams,
you can shape your traffic quite a bit. The InterNAP box is
the only one I'm aware of that'll do inbound. Noction has a
box that does outbound only and they were working on inbound,
but last I knew hadn't finished it yet.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:26:49 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream
There’s a few of them out there.. I have yet to understand why
I would want to buy a big expensive box (and they are NOT
cheap) to influence my outbound BGP traffic, knowing that like
humans, we can only influence inbound BGP traffic a very
limited amount.
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lewis
Bergman
*Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2015 9:34 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream
A few years ago some company proposed an appliance that
proclaimed to manage bgp for multiple circuits. Don't know if
the they are still around. I personally don't think it is a
good investment as so much of the bgp equation depends on the
carrier.
On Apr 17, 2015 2:47 PM, "TJ Trout" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Anyone know of a service that can take several small
business fiber circuits that don't support bgp and bond
them and provide a bgp session ?
--
