Yes, I clearly understand how to implement. Just was wondering if someone offered it turn-key.
I'm thinking that mikrotik won't be turn key, might be a big hassle to make and keep it working On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > No, I'm suggesting you locate a Mikrotik box in the datacenter where you > can get the BGP connection(s). Put a Mikrotik (or more) on the ends of the > broadband fiber connections. VPN from them back to the MT at the > datacenter. Your BGP stays at the datacenter, you use the VPNs as internal > connectivity to the rest of the network. > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://midwest-ix.com/ > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"TJ Trout" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Sunday, April 19, 2015 4:13:09 PM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > I can't comprehend that, are you offering to do hosted bonding with BGP > for me using a mikrotik? > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> April 18, 2015 8:44 AM >> >> ===== >> I'm assuming a Mikrotik at a datacenter where you do BGP with a tunnel to >> the destination router's IPs per upstream port. OSPF magic over the >> different tunnels. >> ===== >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"TJ Trout" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Sunday, April 19, 2015 12:23:09 AM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >> >> Which one? >> On Apr 18, 2015 9:07 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> My proposal still stands. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"TJ Trout" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:23:11 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>> >>> I'm not talking about any bgp stuff guys, I'm talking about the ability >>> to bond several non bgp lines into one virtual pipe that is bgp capable >>> (i.e. with a mikrotik in a data center who can give a bgp session) not >>> talking about bonding multiple bgp capable lines, etc >>> On Apr 18, 2015 4:54 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> No community support, no business. >>>> >>>> http://www.onesc.net/communities/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:42:08 PM >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>> >>>> I have used communities a lot... The problem is non-standard support >>>> and no support at all from some of the transit providers… >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 3:35 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Must not have used communities much? You can exert a lot of control >>>> with them. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 2:32:31 PM >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>> >>>> Yeah the inbound part I’m really skeptical over… >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:43 AM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Through communities, local prefs, etc. and a few upstreams, you can >>>> shape your traffic quite a bit. The InterNAP box is the only one I'm aware >>>> of that'll do inbound. Noction has a box that does outbound only and they >>>> were working on inbound, but last I knew hadn't finished it yet. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:26:49 AM >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>> >>>> There’s a few of them out there.. I have yet to understand why I would >>>> want to buy a big expensive box (and they are NOT cheap) to influence my >>>> outbound BGP traffic, knowing that like humans, we can only influence >>>> inbound BGP traffic a very limited amount. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman >>>> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2015 9:34 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> A few years ago some company proposed an appliance that proclaimed to >>>> manage bgp for multiple circuits. Don't know if the they are still around. >>>> I personally don't think it is a good investment as so much of the bgp >>>> equation depends on the carrier. >>>> >>>> On Apr 17, 2015 2:47 PM, "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Anyone know of a service that can take several small business fiber >>>> circuits that don't support bgp and bond them and provide a bgp session ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
