It'd be nice if they had a list like the old N-Layer. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://midwest-ix.com/ 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 4:33:25 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream 



I honestly wish that were the case in more companies… my favorite is asking a 
potential transit provider “do you support communities” and the answer is 
almost always “yes”. Then I ask for a list of them and get a single community 
for black hole routing sent to me … duh….. 



From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 7:54 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream 


No community support, no business. 

http://www.onesc.net/communities/ 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




----- Original Message -----


From: "Paul Stewart" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:42:08 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream 
I have used communities a lot... The problem is non-standard support and no 
support at all from some of the transit providers… 



From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 3:35 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream 


Must not have used communities much? You can exert a lot of control with them. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Paul Stewart" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 2:32:31 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream 
Yeah the inbound part I’m really skeptical over… 



From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:43 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream 


Through communities, local prefs, etc. and a few upstreams, you can shape your 
traffic quite a bit. The InterNAP box is the only one I'm aware of that'll do 
inbound. Noction has a box that does outbound only and they were working on 
inbound, but last I knew hadn't finished it yet. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 





From: "Paul Stewart" < [email protected] > 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:26:49 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream 
There’s a few of them out there.. I have yet to understand why I would want to 
buy a big expensive box (and they are NOT cheap) to influence my outbound BGP 
traffic, knowing that like humans, we can only influence inbound BGP traffic a 
very limited amount. 

From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman 
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 9:34 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream 

A few years ago some company proposed an appliance that proclaimed to manage 
bgp for multiple circuits. Don't know if the they are still around. I 
personally don't think it is a good investment as so much of the bgp equation 
depends on the carrier. 

On Apr 17, 2015 2:47 PM, "TJ Trout" < [email protected] > wrote: 


Anyone know of a service that can take several small business fiber circuits 
that don't support bgp and bond them and provide a bgp session ? 





Reply via email to