I can't comprehend that, are you offering to do hosted bonding with BGP for me using a mikrotik?
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > April 18, 2015 8:44 AM > > ===== > I'm assuming a Mikrotik at a datacenter where you do BGP with a tunnel to > the destination router's IPs per upstream port. OSPF magic over the > different tunnels. > ===== > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"TJ Trout" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Sunday, April 19, 2015 12:23:09 AM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream > > Which one? > On Apr 18, 2015 9:07 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My proposal still stands. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"TJ Trout" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:23:11 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >> >> I'm not talking about any bgp stuff guys, I'm talking about the ability >> to bond several non bgp lines into one virtual pipe that is bgp capable >> (i.e. with a mikrotik in a data center who can give a bgp session) not >> talking about bonding multiple bgp capable lines, etc >> On Apr 18, 2015 4:54 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> No community support, no business. >>> >>> http://www.onesc.net/communities/ >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 6:42:08 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>> >>> I have used communities a lot... The problem is non-standard support >>> and no support at all from some of the transit providers… >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 3:35 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>> >>> >>> >>> Must not have used communities much? You can exert a lot of control with >>> them. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 2:32:31 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>> >>> Yeah the inbound part I’m really skeptical over… >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 18, 2015 9:43 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>> >>> >>> >>> Through communities, local prefs, etc. and a few upstreams, you can >>> shape your traffic quite a bit. The InterNAP box is the only one I'm aware >>> of that'll do inbound. Noction has a box that does outbound only and they >>> were working on inbound, but last I knew hadn't finished it yet. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> *From: *"Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Saturday, April 18, 2015 8:26:49 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>> >>> There’s a few of them out there.. I have yet to understand why I would >>> want to buy a big expensive box (and they are NOT cheap) to influence my >>> outbound BGP traffic, knowing that like humans, we can only influence >>> inbound BGP traffic a very limited amount. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On >>> Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman >>> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2015 9:34 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aggrigation of upstream >>> >>> >>> >>> A few years ago some company proposed an appliance that proclaimed to >>> manage bgp for multiple circuits. Don't know if the they are still around. >>> I personally don't think it is a good investment as so much of the bgp >>> equation depends on the carrier. >>> >>> On Apr 17, 2015 2:47 PM, "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Anyone know of a service that can take several small business fiber >>> circuits that don't support bgp and bond them and provide a bgp session ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
