That's about it, but two companies in that space selling complete Linux
networking stacks are 6WIND and Wind River, I've investigated them both
pretty extensively. It'd be fun to play with one day. Go look into the
Intel DPDK. The problem is you have to build each application to support
it, so I really doubt there's going to be much useful open source
development in this space, as everything has to be tailored to exactly
what you want it to do. And it is really expensive. I am pretty sure I
had to sign an NDA with both 6WIND and Wind River, so I won't throw
specific numbers out, but it's definitely not pocket change.
I really wanted to do some stuff with it for the Powercode BMU, but I
don't really have the skill set (or the time right now) to work on it.
You're right though, it's very interesting.
On 04/22/2015 12:06 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Sandvine looks to have similar specs on their platforms as well.
Anyways, that would be really surprising to me Simon. I didn't expect
a multi-generational leap in performance until more things used
PF_RING from ntop, or things like netmap gain in development and
popularity. I know 6WIND does similar things with kernel bypass,
pushing the stack into user space, but AFAIK there are only about 4 or
5 companies with any sort of kernel bypass capability of the network
stack.
If you have any additional information, please do share. This is a
fascinating topic I've been monitoring since around 2011.
On April 22, 2015 8:54:37 AM AKDT, Simon Westlake
<[email protected]> wrote:
600Gbps in software is actually not unreasonable nowadays either,
if you're using something like DPDK. Go look at companies like
6WIND, they claim on an Intel Xeon CPU, being able to do in excess
of 5 million PPS on a single core. Apparently scales as far as you
can go. Granted, there's a lot of development work to use DPDK,
but it's allegedly possible.
I think most of the Procera stuff is actually done in software, I
don't think they have any dedicated ASICs, it's all Intel
hardware. They probably use DPDK.
On 04/22/2015 10:37 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
I think you're thinking about Saisei or whatever.
Procera is done in hardware :) they also can stack their
management in distributed deployments.
On April 22, 2015 7:32:22 AM AKDT, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]>
wrote:
Looks like I was wrong, they have some pretty big boxes.
600 Gbps and still all in software?
*From:* Josh Luthman <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 22, 2015 10:07 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Procera sold for $240M
I was gonna say...isn't that kinda their market?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Paul Stewart
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
“I’m not sure Procera has a box for the really big
carriers like Comcast, AT&T, Verizon. I assume Google
Fiber will design and build their own, unless they
totally believe in throwing bandwidth at the problem.”
http://www.proceranetworks.com/products/pl20000
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
Simon Westlake
Powercode - The smart choice in ISP billing and OSS
powercode.com <http://powercode.com>
P: 920-351-1010
E: [email protected]
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
Simon Westlake
Powercode - The smart choice in ISP billing and OSS
powercode.com <http://powercode.com>
P: 920-351-1010
E: [email protected]
