Yeah, it just kind of barely sits there, but it isn't going anywhere. It definitely doesn't 'lock' in.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it flimsy at all? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Actually, they will slide right onto the Rocket dish if you only use the >> top two pins. >> They won't directly bolt on to the old dishes due to the GPS connector >> being in the way, but you can use them on any antenna you want. There's >> nothing proprietary about them. Just need pigtails and a method of mounting. >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> >> Midwest Internet Exchange >> http://www.midwest-ix.com >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Sam Lambie" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 5, 2015 9:38:01 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X >> >> Can the 5x be installed on older Ubnt rocket 30 dbi dishes? or would I >> need to install new dishes to accommodate the new radios? >> >> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, you have to use different channels for RX and TX... which can also >>> be a significant advantage in some cases. >>> >>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Jon Langeler <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> In Ubiquiti's version of FDD, is it different channel range for the Rx? >>>> The risk there is anyone else sees that channel as clear. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On May 4, 2015, at 11:03 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I've been seeing 1-2ms on out AF5x link, not quite as good as an AF5 in >>>> FDD, but better than any other synced radio I've seen. >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 6:03 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have one AF5 up running FDD in the DFS band at 3.4 miles. We didn't >>>>> want to try to push an AF24 that far. RTT average is around 0.8ms, so yes, >>>>> like a licensed radio. >>>>> >>>>> No idea about the AF5X, haven't bought any. But I'd guess latency >>>>> would be similar to the AF5 or 24 in half-duplex mode, which is going to >>>>> be >>>>> like 4-5ms. I have only done FDD though.. because it's moar better. >>>>> >>>>> On 5/4/2015 5:53 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So I assume latency in FDD mode is sub millisecond like a licensed >>>>>> backhaul? >>>>>> >>>>>> What's is latency like on the AF5X? Similar to a PTP600, a few >>>>>> milliseconds and very constant? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) >>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 5:48 PM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF5 vs AF5X >>>>>> >>>>>> No FDD. Not 48 volt. Not 40+ watts. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5/4/2015 5:45 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Can someone point me to a concise explanation somewhere of the >>>>>>> difference between AF5 and AF5X? Where you would use each, and what you >>>>>>> give up with the X in return for smaller, cheaper, lower power, and >>>>>>> drop-in >>>>>>> replacement for a Rocket? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know it doesn't have the built-in high isolation TX and RX >>>>>>> antennas, and doesn't do a gig of throughput. But I'm sure there's >>>>>>> more to >>>>>>> it. It's not jumping out at me on the UBNT website. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> *Sam Lambie* >> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >> 575-758-7598 Office >> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com> >> >> >
