They're the latest products from both companies is the only reason I offered up the comparison.
On Friday, May 15, 2015, Faisal Imtiaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I the only one reading this discussion and shaking my head..... > > The comparison of these two is absurd and ridiculous... it reminds me of > the discussion of this exact nature when Ubiquiti M products were first > available in the market place and folks had conversation very similar > Ubiquiti M (802.11n) vs Canopy (802.11 b/g) products ? > > Ubiquiti AC PTMP is one of the first 802.11ac PTMP system in the market > place... A better comparison would be with PTMP systems of the same > class... (e.g. Mimosa PTMP, expected later this year, and I would not be > surprised at all if Cambium also has a 802.11ac PTMP product in their > pipeline.).... Didn't Trango also announce / have a shipping PTMP system > based on 802.11ac ? Anyone has info on that ? > > :) > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Mathew Howard" <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > *To: *"af" <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > *Sent: *Friday, May 15, 2015 10:23:58 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC > > Which is where ePMP comes in. you get reasonable cost and sync... which > makes good spectrum management a lot easier. > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Jeremy <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Perhaps, but at 1000x the cost. >> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> I'd suggest with careful spectrum management, proper loading, AND better >>> equipment you'd still be better off. >>> >>> I have 22 towers with over a hundred UBNT APs in a valley 11 miles wide, >>> built over the top of a synced Canopy network. I take about 10 customers a >>> week off of their 450 platform and we are constantly told that the >>> difference is night and day better on our network. Careful spectrum >>> management and proper AP loading wins over sync every time. >>> >>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>>> No, we can't always control that, but if I can at least control it >>>> sometimes, I'll take it. >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> And you have the opinion you can control that, constantly, on >>>>> unlicensed spectrum? >>>>> >>>>> *smirk* >>>>> >>>>> Josh Reynolds >>>>> CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com >>>>> >>>>> On 05/15/2015 05:46 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>>> >>>>> That's a very good point, regardless of what some customers seem to >>>>> think, mbps really isn't the most important thing... >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected] >>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I've always considered mbps to be among the least important concerns >>>>>> on PTMP, well below packet loss, jitter, QoS features, manageability, >>>>>> consistency, and reliability. Which is why I'm not super keen on *any* >>>>>> of >>>>>> the wifi stuff. This seems is like an argument about whether a Pinto is >>>>>> better than a Fiesta. >>>>>> </smug> >>>>>> >>>>>> One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*) >>>>>> >>>>>> Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per >>>>>> sub" (*) >>>>>> >>>>>> (*) under the right conditions >>>>>> >>>>>> Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more >>>>>> important. >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Reynolds >>>>>> CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> But no sync. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] >>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf >>>>>> Of *Peter Kranz >>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> AC blows doors on ePMP >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> >>>>>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 >>>>>> Mobile: 510-207-0000 >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] >>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *On Behalf >>>>>> Of *Jason McKemie >>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are >>>>>> other's thoughts on these two products? I'm looking at 5GHz, and I know >>>>>> the AC gear doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they will in >>>>>> the >>>>>> near future. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -Jason >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
