One could then say that it matters more. ;-) The PMP guys used to say ours is better because only we have sync. They don't have that advantage anymore. It is better, but it is no long enough better.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 11:50:49 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC When it costs $1200/year per antenna on a tower, I would argue that the cost of the equipment is not the issue. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 5/15/2015 7:22 PM, Jeremy wrote: Perhaps, but at 1000x the cost. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Adam Moffett < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I'd suggest with careful spectrum management, proper loading, AND better equipment you'd still be better off. <blockquote> I have 22 towers with over a hundred UBNT APs in a valley 11 miles wide, built over the top of a synced Canopy network. I take about 10 customers a week off of their 450 platform and we are constantly told that the difference is night and day better on our network. Careful spectrum management and proper AP loading wins over sync every time. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:11 PM, Mathew Howard < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> No, we can't always control that, but if I can at least control it sometimes, I'll take it. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Josh Reynolds < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> And you have the opinion you can control that, constantly, on unlicensed spectrum? *smirk* Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com On 05/15/2015 05:46 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: <blockquote> That's a very good point, regardless of what some customers seem to think, mbps really isn't the most important thing... On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Adam Moffett < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I've always considered mbps to be among the least important concerns on PTMP, well below packet loss, jitter, QoS features, manageability, consistency, and reliability. Which is why I'm not super keen on *any* of the wifi stuff. This seems is like an argument about whether a Pinto is better than a Fiesta. </smug> <blockquote> One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*) Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per sub" (*) (*) under the right conditions Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more important. Josh Reynolds CIO, SPITwSPOTS www.spitwspots.com On 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: <blockquote> But no sync. From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC AC blows doors on ePMP Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 [email protected] From: Af [ mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are other's thoughts on these two products? I'm looking at 5GHz, and I know the AC gear doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they will in the near future. -Jason </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
