I don't believe you read it Jaime. I have never seen you do any work without posting a picture of it. Since you provided no photographic evidence of your reading this email thread I can't substantiate your having read it.
In fact, now that I think of it, I think you post more non work Tecate photos than whomever is in charge of Tecate social media. On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 7:31 AM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> wrote: > Half price sale? > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Friday, May 22, 2015 8:20 AM > *To:* Animal Farm > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] charging for service calls > > > > I am billing you guys a consulting fee of 100.00 an hour just to read > this. > > Jaime Solorza > > On May 22, 2015 4:23 AM, "Shayne Lebrun" <[email protected]> wrote: > > If all service calls are chargable, but you waive where it's your fault, > or otherwise indicated, you're an awesome business doing right by your > customers. > > If you roll for free, then charge when you find the customer's been using > the radio for target practice, you're a greedy bastard who's out to squeeze > every last penny out of innocent, hard-working regular folk, who just made > a simple mistake, aren't smart with all that computer stuff, and didn't > realize that electronic equipment works best without holes in it, and > shouldn't be punished because YOU didn't explain that to them. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 1:31 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AFMUG] charging for service calls > > There have been some discussions at the office recently on this topic. > One camp feels that the default action should be to charge for all service > calls, and make an exception if necessary. The other camp feels that we > should reserve the right to charge for a service call, but we should only > do so if the problem is somehow the customer's fault (like hitting the > cable with the weed whacker). The discussion in our office is only about > fixing internet service by the way, not about fixing computers or other > customer equipment. > > I was wondering what the peanut gallery thinks today. > >
