You should probably read the changelogs. I had a few weird issues on older firmware...like version 6.7 or so. I never had it crash completely, the worst thing was an issue where ethernet ports would flap. It's been a year or more since anything unexpected happened to me with a CCR, but in the changelogs I still see bugs being fixed that cite crashing under specific circumstances.

There was one problem I had that I don't know if it was resolved. If I put an SFP module into an SFP+ port, I couldn't get ethernet link to another unit that had the SFP module in an SFP port. I tried it several times because I thought in theory these things were backwards compatible, but it never worked for me and I just stopped trying that configuration.

I have a feeling if you go out of your way to find things that crash it, you'll find some. Though if you do, I hope you'll report it to Mikrotik support.

Ok thanks�

Any stability issues with them in general? I know this is a broad question .. I�ll be comparing this to what I�m used to (Cisco/Juniper) which are traditionally rock solid for years on end

I tested some smaller units before and managed to melt them down pretty quickly .. granted it wasn�t for WISP application and we were going out of our way to try and take them offline (testing)

*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
*Sent:* Friday, June 5, 2015 11:38 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] CCR1036-8G-2S+EM

You won't have a performance problem.� Before firewall rules you'll be at like 2% CPU.�

I don't think they make the 36 core unit with dual power supplies....which is something I never understood.� Otherwise I think you'll like what it does and how easily it does it.


    Anyone used one of these � any feedback?

    �

    I�m getting involved with a wireless expansion project probably
    at some point and these Routerboard CCR1036-8G-2S+EM were
    specified in the project plans.

    �

    Roughly speaking, 600-800Mb/s of traffic going through them �
    roughly 2500 PPPOE users terminating on it (BRAS).� This is just
    an estimate at this point�.

    �

    Whether I like it or not, it looks like I�m swimming into
    Routerboard and Ubiquiti territory �. K

    �

    Thanks,

    Paul

    �

    �


Reply via email to