We've got one, might have a different amount of RAM, don't remember.

Worked okay, but my QoS rules hit one of 36 CPUs pretty hard, the others were 
idling.

The cable engineer had to have a CCR because it was faster than the Core i7 
router I built for them. Turns out the ponytailed computer guy *might* actually 
know what he's talking about.

As far as routing, switching, etc, they seem to do fine. With the QoS setup I 
have routing 250Mbps at the time, the CCR couldn't spread the load over 
multiple cores. When I disabled my QoS rules the CCR routed just fine at an 
idle. A big part of the reason we went with MT for the edge was the QoS 
control, so the CCR has now been assigned another job.

I think this was around 6.12 or so. Might work better now. A lot of other 
things work better as of around 6.20.



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Paul Stewart 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 10:18 AM
  Subject: [AFMUG] CCR1036-8G-2S+EM


  Anyone used one of these - any feedback?

   

  I'm getting involved with a wireless expansion project probably at some point 
and these Routerboard CCR1036-8G-2S+EM were specified in the project plans.

   

  Roughly speaking, 600-800Mb/s of traffic going through them - roughly 2500 
PPPOE users terminating on it (BRAS).  This is just an estimate at this point..

   

  Whether I like it or not, it looks like I'm swimming into Routerboard and 
Ubiquiti territory .. K

   

  Thanks,

  Paul

   

   

Reply via email to