Re: [AFMUG] CCR1036-8G-2S+EM

Fri, 05 Jun 2015 11:15:29 -0700

Interesting. I knew BGP was single threaded. Apparently multi-threading BGP was too complex (or something) and they decided to optimize their algorithms instead. I wasn't aware that anything else was limited to a single thread. I sure hope that isn't still a thing. 


We've got one, might have a different amount of RAM, don't remember.


Worked okay, but my QoS rules hit one of 36 CPUs pretty hard, the 
others were idling.
The cable engineer had to have a CCR because it was faster than the 
Core i7 router I built for them. Turns out the ponytailed computer guy 
*might* actually know what he's talking about.
As far as routing, switching, etc, they seem to do fine. With the QoS 
setup I have routing 250Mbps at the time, the CCR couldn't spread the 
load over multiple cores. When I disabled my QoS rules the CCR routed 
just fine at an idle. A big part of the reason we went with MT for the 
edge was the QoS control, so the CCR has now been assigned another job.



I think this was around 6.12 or so. Might work better now. A lot of 
other things work better as of around 6.20.


    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* Paul Stewart <mailto:[email protected]>
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Friday, June 05, 2015 10:18 AM
    *Subject:* [AFMUG] CCR1036-8G-2S+EM

    Anyone used one of these � any feedback?

    I�m getting involved with a wireless expansion project probably at
    some point and these Routerboard CCR1036-8G-2S+EM were specified
    in the project plans.

    Roughly speaking, 600-800Mb/s of traffic going through them �
    roughly 2500 PPPOE users terminating on it (BRAS).  This is just
    an estimate at this point�.

    Whether I like it or not, it looks like I�m swimming into
    Routerboard and Ubiquiti territory �. K

    Thanks,

    Paul

























					Reply via email to