Thanks for the feedback..
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 1:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CCR1036-8G-2S+EM We've got one, might have a different amount of RAM, don't remember. Worked okay, but my QoS rules hit one of 36 CPUs pretty hard, the others were idling. The cable engineer had to have a CCR because it was faster than the Core i7 router I built for them. Turns out the ponytailed computer guy *might* actually know what he's talking about. As far as routing, switching, etc, they seem to do fine. With the QoS setup I have routing 250Mbps at the time, the CCR couldn't spread the load over multiple cores. When I disabled my QoS rules the CCR routed just fine at an idle. A big part of the reason we went with MT for the edge was the QoS control, so the CCR has now been assigned another job. I think this was around 6.12 or so. Might work better now. A lot of other things work better as of around 6.20. ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Stewart <mailto:[email protected]> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 10:18 AM Subject: [AFMUG] CCR1036-8G-2S+EM Anyone used one of these - any feedback? I'm getting involved with a wireless expansion project probably at some point and these Routerboard CCR1036-8G-2S+EM were specified in the project plans. Roughly speaking, 600-800Mb/s of traffic going through them - roughly 2500 PPPOE users terminating on it (BRAS). This is just an estimate at this point.. Whether I like it or not, it looks like I'm swimming into Routerboard and Ubiquiti territory .. :| Thanks, Paul
