Negative sir. I've referring to Gigabit ethernet running on fiber optic cable with gigabit SFP modules. The problem occurred when one of the SFP modules was in an SFP+ (i.e. 10 gigabit) port which in theory should have been backwards compatible.

On 6/5/2015 12:17 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:

Did you just say you couldn't get your fiber to link when plugged into ethernet?

On Jun 5, 2015 11:02 AM, "Adam Moffett" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    You should probably read the changelogs.� I had a few weird
    issues on older firmware...like version 6.7 or so.� I never had
    it crash completely, the worst thing was an issue where ethernet
    ports would flap.� It's been a year or more since anything
    unexpected happened to me with a CCR, but in the changelogs I
    still see bugs being fixed that cite crashing under specific
    circumstances.

    There was one problem I had that I don't know if it was
    resolved.� If I put an SFP module into an SFP+ port, I couldn't
    get ethernet link to another unit that had the SFP module in an
    SFP port.� I tried it several times because I thought in theory
    these things were backwards compatible, but it never worked for me
    and I just stopped trying that configuration.

    I have a feeling if you go out of your way to find things that
    crash it, you'll find some.� Though if you do, I hope you'll
    report it to Mikrotik support.

    Ok thanks�

    �

    Any stability issues with them in general?� I know this is a
    broad question .. I�ll be comparing this to what I�m used to
    (Cisco/Juniper) which are traditionally rock solid for years on end

    �

    I tested some smaller units before and managed to melt them down
    pretty quickly .. granted it wasn�t for WISP application and we
    were going out of our way to try and take them offline (testing)

    �

    *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Moffett
    *Sent:* Friday, June 5, 2015 11:38 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] CCR1036-8G-2S+EM

    �

    You won't have a performance problem.� Before firewall rules
    you'll be at like 2% CPU.�

    I don't think they make the 36 core unit with dual power
    supplies....which is something I never understood.� Otherwise I
    think you'll like what it does and how easily it does it.


        Anyone used one of these � any feedback?

        �

        I�m getting involved with a wireless expansion project
        probably at some point and these Routerboard CCR1036-8G-2S+EM
        were specified in the project plans.

        �

        Roughly speaking, 600-800Mb/s of traffic going through them
        � roughly 2500 PPPOE users terminating on it (BRAS).�
        This is just an estimate at this point�.

        �

        Whether I like it or not, it looks like I�m swimming into
        Routerboard and Ubiquiti territory �. K

        �

        Thanks,

        Paul

        �

        �

    �



Reply via email to