It doesn't work on Cisco. Someone on NANOG just tried to use it (internally).
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:52 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > Good luck updating every IP stack on the planet. > > On 7/1/2015 11:46 AM, Keefe John wrote: > > Maybe they should start allocating 240.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 > > On 7/1/2015 11:06 AM, Roger Timmerman wrote: > > I like XKCD's map of IP allocations. It's somewhat out of date, but does > show where a lot of waste is at, which hasn't changed much since this was > created. > > https://xkcd.com/195/ > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Not sure about Daimler, but Ford does... I'm sure there are a lot worse >> wastes of IPs than the HAMs. >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Josh Luthman < >> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Doesn't Ford and Daimler have a /8? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Jul 1, 2015 12:14 AM, "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> speaking as a extra class amateur radio operstor, does anyone else >>>> think it's excessive that arpa net or whatever has a /8 issued to them? 16 >>>> million some precious ipv4 for "testing" purposes? I'm always pro ham radio >>>> rights, but seriously ? >>>> >>> >> > > >
