Wifi mode actually does work on the ePMP APs - it's just kind of a pain to
enabie (you have to do it through the command line), but it seems to work
fine... I've used it a few times to convert towers from UBNT to ePMP.

I can dig up the commands if you want to know how to do it.

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> That's the only way to do it now.  It sucks since I want to replace some
> single pol Mikrotik APs with dual pol, it would be preferred to jump to
> dual pol Wifi with epmp and then when all the CPEs are moved, go from Wifi
> to TDD.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Swap the CPE first?
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>
>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>
>>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:50:10 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250
>>
>> Same here.  Unfortunately Wifi mode doesn't work at all on the AP.
>> That's coming in 2.5 which is supposed to be this year.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Everything but the firmware for 5150. I'd imagine they're waiting on DFS
>>> approval to just do one firmware release.
>>>
>>> Replacing UBNT with ePMP? That's what I've been doing.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>  <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange
>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>>>
>>>  <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]>
>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:33:52 PM
>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250
>>>
>>> Anybody know, has there been any change in status regarding U-NII-1?
>>> I've
>>> searched the UBNT Forums and can't find anything other than SOON.
>>>
>>> Ignoring AC series and just focusing on M5, last I heard the products
>>> capable of operating in 5150-5250 (without buying bootleg INTL versions)
>>> were Rocket, NS, NS Loco, and NanoBridge.  With the NanoBridge being a
>>> legacy product being kept around until the NanoBeams were approved.  And
>>> I'm
>>> not sure they are still on the shelf anywhere.
>>>
>>> Have they even filed the lab report on the M5 NanoBeams, much less
>>> provided
>>> license keys, stickers, and firmware?  I think the Powerbeam AC and
>>> maybe
>>> Nanobeam AC were a little farther along, with approval and
>>> licenses/stickers
>>> but no firmware yet, perhaps because they want to also get DFS in there,
>>> perhaps because they are resubmitting to the lab to get higher EIRP
>>> under
>>> the new rules?
>>>
>>> Is there any hope for a NanoBeam that will talk to a Rocket M5 in
>>> U-NII-1?
>>>
>>> I mean seriously, are we going to have to start taking down Rocket APs
>>> and
>>> replacing with ePMP?  Having Rockets or Nanostations as the only CPE
>>> choices
>>> is just not viable.
>>>
>>> Is UBNT just focusing on AC now?  They don't talk to M series though, do
>>> they?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to