Mine was also 5 GHz. I should have said NSM5 but that damn auto correct. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jul 15, 2015 8:16 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It was also 5ghz in my case... that also probably makes a difference. That > probably explains why it can't be enabled through the GUI yet. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> I know I had Mikrotik and Ubnt (NSM2 maybe even Beam400). WiFi is not >> ready yet. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Jul 15, 2015 8:09 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> hmm... weird, I think the most I had on an AP was 5 CPEs, but they >>> seemed to work fine, and none of the customers complained. All the clients >>> were nanobridges, if that makes a difference. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Uh it doesn't work. At all. I had 18 CPEs that would associate but >>>> 100 kbps was peak throughout. Mikrotik was solid before but with G rates >>>> and one polarity it was about time to upgrade. >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> On Jul 15, 2015 8:00 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Wifi mode actually does work on the ePMP APs - it's just kind of a >>>>> pain to enabie (you have to do it through the command line), but it seems >>>>> to work fine... I've used it a few times to convert towers from UBNT to >>>>> ePMP. >>>>> >>>>> I can dig up the commands if you want to know how to do it. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> That's the only way to do it now. It sucks since I want to replace >>>>>> some single pol Mikrotik APs with dual pol, it would be preferred to jump >>>>>> to dual pol Wifi with epmp and then when all the CPEs are moved, go from >>>>>> Wifi to TDD. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Swap the CPE first? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:50:10 PM >>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Same here. Unfortunately Wifi mode doesn't work at all on the AP. >>>>>>> That's coming in 2.5 which is supposed to be this year. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Everything but the firmware for 5150. I'd imagine they're waiting >>>>>>>> on DFS approval to just do one firmware release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Replacing UBNT with ePMP? That's what I've been doing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:33:52 PM >>>>>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Anybody know, has there been any change in status regarding >>>>>>>> U-NII-1? I've >>>>>>>> searched the UBNT Forums and can't find anything other than SOON. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ignoring AC series and just focusing on M5, last I heard the >>>>>>>> products >>>>>>>> capable of operating in 5150-5250 (without buying bootleg INTL >>>>>>>> versions) >>>>>>>> were Rocket, NS, NS Loco, and NanoBridge. With the NanoBridge >>>>>>>> being a >>>>>>>> legacy product being kept around until the NanoBeams were >>>>>>>> approved. And I'm >>>>>>>> not sure they are still on the shelf anywhere. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have they even filed the lab report on the M5 NanoBeams, much less >>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>> license keys, stickers, and firmware? I think the Powerbeam AC and >>>>>>>> maybe >>>>>>>> Nanobeam AC were a little farther along, with approval and >>>>>>>> licenses/stickers >>>>>>>> but no firmware yet, perhaps because they want to also get DFS in >>>>>>>> there, >>>>>>>> perhaps because they are resubmitting to the lab to get higher EIRP >>>>>>>> under >>>>>>>> the new rules? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any hope for a NanoBeam that will talk to a Rocket M5 in >>>>>>>> U-NII-1? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I mean seriously, are we going to have to start taking down Rocket >>>>>>>> APs and >>>>>>>> replacing with ePMP? Having Rockets or Nanostations as the only >>>>>>>> CPE choices >>>>>>>> is just not viable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is UBNT just focusing on AC now? They don't talk to M series >>>>>>>> though, do >>>>>>>> they? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >
