It might just not be able to handle more than a few clients very well then... or it didn't like the Mikrotiks... or I was just lucky. Whatever the case, I'm definitely going to be careful where I use it until they get it working right.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Mine was also 5 GHz. I should have said NSM5 but that damn auto correct. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jul 15, 2015 8:16 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It was also 5ghz in my case... that also probably makes a difference. >> That probably explains why it can't be enabled through the GUI yet. >> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I know I had Mikrotik and Ubnt (NSM2 maybe even Beam400). WiFi is not >>> ready yet. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Jul 15, 2015 8:09 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> hmm... weird, I think the most I had on an AP was 5 CPEs, but they >>>> seemed to work fine, and none of the customers complained. All the clients >>>> were nanobridges, if that makes a difference. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Uh it doesn't work. At all. I had 18 CPEs that would associate but >>>>> 100 kbps was peak throughout. Mikrotik was solid before but with G rates >>>>> and one polarity it was about time to upgrade. >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> On Jul 15, 2015 8:00 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Wifi mode actually does work on the ePMP APs - it's just kind of a >>>>>> pain to enabie (you have to do it through the command line), but it seems >>>>>> to work fine... I've used it a few times to convert towers from UBNT to >>>>>> ePMP. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can dig up the commands if you want to know how to do it. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Josh Luthman < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> That's the only way to do it now. It sucks since I want to replace >>>>>>> some single pol Mikrotik APs with dual pol, it would be preferred to >>>>>>> jump >>>>>>> to dual pol Wifi with epmp and then when all the CPEs are moved, go from >>>>>>> Wifi to TDD. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Swap the CPE first? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:50:10 PM >>>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Same here. Unfortunately Wifi mode doesn't work at all on the AP. >>>>>>>> That's coming in 2.5 which is supposed to be this year. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Everything but the firmware for 5150. I'd imagine they're waiting >>>>>>>>> on DFS approval to just do one firmware release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Replacing UBNT with ePMP? That's what I've been doing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>>>>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:33:52 PM >>>>>>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anybody know, has there been any change in status regarding >>>>>>>>> U-NII-1? I've >>>>>>>>> searched the UBNT Forums and can't find anything other than SOON. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ignoring AC series and just focusing on M5, last I heard the >>>>>>>>> products >>>>>>>>> capable of operating in 5150-5250 (without buying bootleg INTL >>>>>>>>> versions) >>>>>>>>> were Rocket, NS, NS Loco, and NanoBridge. With the NanoBridge >>>>>>>>> being a >>>>>>>>> legacy product being kept around until the NanoBeams were >>>>>>>>> approved. And I'm >>>>>>>>> not sure they are still on the shelf anywhere. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Have they even filed the lab report on the M5 NanoBeams, much less >>>>>>>>> provided >>>>>>>>> license keys, stickers, and firmware? I think the Powerbeam AC >>>>>>>>> and maybe >>>>>>>>> Nanobeam AC were a little farther along, with approval and >>>>>>>>> licenses/stickers >>>>>>>>> but no firmware yet, perhaps because they want to also get DFS in >>>>>>>>> there, >>>>>>>>> perhaps because they are resubmitting to the lab to get higher >>>>>>>>> EIRP under >>>>>>>>> the new rules? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there any hope for a NanoBeam that will talk to a Rocket M5 in >>>>>>>>> U-NII-1? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I mean seriously, are we going to have to start taking down Rocket >>>>>>>>> APs and >>>>>>>>> replacing with ePMP? Having Rockets or Nanostations as the only >>>>>>>>> CPE choices >>>>>>>>> is just not viable. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is UBNT just focusing on AC now? They don't talk to M series >>>>>>>>> though, do >>>>>>>>> they? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>
