Uh it doesn't work. At all. I had 18 CPEs that would associate but 100 kbps was peak throughout. Mikrotik was solid before but with G rates and one polarity it was about time to upgrade.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jul 15, 2015 8:00 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: > Wifi mode actually does work on the ePMP APs - it's just kind of a pain to > enabie (you have to do it through the command line), but it seems to work > fine... I've used it a few times to convert towers from UBNT to ePMP. > > I can dig up the commands if you want to know how to do it. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> That's the only way to do it now. It sucks since I want to replace some >> single pol Mikrotik APs with dual pol, it would be preferred to jump to >> dual pol Wifi with epmp and then when all the CPEs are moved, go from Wifi >> to TDD. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Swap the CPE first? >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:50:10 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250 >>> >>> Same here. Unfortunately Wifi mode doesn't work at all on the AP. >>> That's coming in 2.5 which is supposed to be this year. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Everything but the firmware for 5150. I'd imagine they're waiting on >>>> DFS approval to just do one firmware release. >>>> >>>> Replacing UBNT with ePMP? That's what I've been doing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> >>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:33:52 PM >>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250 >>>> >>>> Anybody know, has there been any change in status regarding U-NII-1? >>>> I've >>>> searched the UBNT Forums and can't find anything other than SOON. >>>> >>>> Ignoring AC series and just focusing on M5, last I heard the products >>>> capable of operating in 5150-5250 (without buying bootleg INTL >>>> versions) >>>> were Rocket, NS, NS Loco, and NanoBridge. With the NanoBridge being a >>>> legacy product being kept around until the NanoBeams were approved. >>>> And I'm >>>> not sure they are still on the shelf anywhere. >>>> >>>> Have they even filed the lab report on the M5 NanoBeams, much less >>>> provided >>>> license keys, stickers, and firmware? I think the Powerbeam AC and >>>> maybe >>>> Nanobeam AC were a little farther along, with approval and >>>> licenses/stickers >>>> but no firmware yet, perhaps because they want to also get DFS in >>>> there, >>>> perhaps because they are resubmitting to the lab to get higher EIRP >>>> under >>>> the new rules? >>>> >>>> Is there any hope for a NanoBeam that will talk to a Rocket M5 in >>>> U-NII-1? >>>> >>>> I mean seriously, are we going to have to start taking down Rocket APs >>>> and >>>> replacing with ePMP? Having Rockets or Nanostations as the only CPE >>>> choices >>>> is just not viable. >>>> >>>> Is UBNT just focusing on AC now? They don't talk to M series though, >>>> do >>>> they? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
