hmm... weird, I think the most I had on an AP was 5 CPEs, but they seemed to work fine, and none of the customers complained. All the clients were nanobridges, if that makes a difference.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Uh it doesn't work. At all. I had 18 CPEs that would associate but 100 > kbps was peak throughout. Mikrotik was solid before but with G rates and > one polarity it was about time to upgrade. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jul 15, 2015 8:00 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Wifi mode actually does work on the ePMP APs - it's just kind of a pain >> to enabie (you have to do it through the command line), but it seems to >> work fine... I've used it a few times to convert towers from UBNT to ePMP. >> >> I can dig up the commands if you want to know how to do it. >> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> That's the only way to do it now. It sucks since I want to replace some >>> single pol Mikrotik APs with dual pol, it would be preferred to jump to >>> dual pol Wifi with epmp and then when all the CPEs are moved, go from Wifi >>> to TDD. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Swap the CPE first? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> >>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:50:10 PM >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250 >>>> >>>> Same here. Unfortunately Wifi mode doesn't work at all on the AP. >>>> That's coming in 2.5 which is supposed to be this year. >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Everything but the firmware for 5150. I'd imagine they're waiting on >>>>> DFS approval to just do one firmware release. >>>>> >>>>> Replacing UBNT with ePMP? That's what I've been doing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- >>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>> >>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> >>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 15, 2015 2:33:52 PM >>>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] UBNT status re: 5150-5250 >>>>> >>>>> Anybody know, has there been any change in status regarding U-NII-1? >>>>> I've >>>>> searched the UBNT Forums and can't find anything other than SOON. >>>>> >>>>> Ignoring AC series and just focusing on M5, last I heard the products >>>>> capable of operating in 5150-5250 (without buying bootleg INTL >>>>> versions) >>>>> were Rocket, NS, NS Loco, and NanoBridge. With the NanoBridge being a >>>>> legacy product being kept around until the NanoBeams were approved. >>>>> And I'm >>>>> not sure they are still on the shelf anywhere. >>>>> >>>>> Have they even filed the lab report on the M5 NanoBeams, much less >>>>> provided >>>>> license keys, stickers, and firmware? I think the Powerbeam AC and >>>>> maybe >>>>> Nanobeam AC were a little farther along, with approval and >>>>> licenses/stickers >>>>> but no firmware yet, perhaps because they want to also get DFS in >>>>> there, >>>>> perhaps because they are resubmitting to the lab to get higher EIRP >>>>> under >>>>> the new rules? >>>>> >>>>> Is there any hope for a NanoBeam that will talk to a Rocket M5 in >>>>> U-NII-1? >>>>> >>>>> I mean seriously, are we going to have to start taking down Rocket APs >>>>> and >>>>> replacing with ePMP? Having Rockets or Nanostations as the only CPE >>>>> choices >>>>> is just not viable. >>>>> >>>>> Is UBNT just focusing on AC now? They don't talk to M series though, >>>>> do >>>>> they? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
