It could always be worse.
On 10/12/2015 12:16 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
He can’t be influenced by other peoples money. Not a bad thing.
Again, could he be worse than what we have?
Rory
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
*Sent:* Monday, October 12, 2015 9:13 AM
*To:* af
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Guns etc
So... you're saying we should elect Trump? He does run a large
organization, afterall :P
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
Everyone wants to elect a President based on ideology (or
likeability), ignoring that the primary job is to run the executive
branch. Eisenhower was probably the last POTUS who came to the job
with credentials for effectively running a giant organization. Not
saying someone can’t grow to fill the job, look at Reagan and JFK.
But seriously, Ben Carson?
I see the same mistake in the current contest to see what poor schmuck
gets to be Speaker of the House. They want to make it about ideology,
and yes it’s about getting the ideology of the majority caucus into
legislation, but the Speaker should be a get-stuff-done type, not an
ideologue. People still remember Sam Rayburn and Tip O’Neill. Hey,
they could bring Newt Gingrich or Denny Hastert out of retirement.
Looks like Hastert will avoid jail time, and he could probably use the
money after paying all that hush money.
*From:*Patrick Leary <mailto:patrick.le...@telrad.com>
*Sent:*Monday, October 12, 2015 10:22 AM
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] OT Guns etc
Your vision of Reagan is of a cartoon character, devoid of reality,
factually ignorant, and it vastly insults his memory. Were Reagan
president today, you'd be calling him a "libtard." You are clearly
under 40 years old.
Patrick Leary
Telrad
On Oct 11, 2015 5:47 PM, Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com
<mailto:wireless...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Nixon was conservative, but with him trying to cover up his crooked
tail, we never saw much of anything from him. He was truly
ineffective. Ford and Bush?? Hahaha. Not conservative RINO.
Reagan, a different story. He wasn't perfect, but in his heart he held
conservatism high. There is only one way to preside and that is to
work with the other side some. That's when he had to give up his far
right position some Nixon is the only conservative that had any
bearing on this country in the last 50 years. I should say
conservative bearing!
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
Nixon Ford Reagan Bush...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com
<mailto:wireless...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes, one.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
You know we've had conservative politicians and presidents in the last
50 years right?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Oct 11, 2015 3:52 PM, "Philip Rankin" <wireless...@gmail.com
<mailto:wireless...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Since many of you are calling me rude, how about we just reverse that
logic??? How about all of the damage the liberal logic has done to
this country in the past say 50 years???? Is that not rude? You
know, actually it's so far beyond rude, that we can't measure it
anymore. Start with the debt, the credit ratings of the country, the
backdoor payoff deals, the stupidity of laws that cover laws that
should not have ever been written in the first place. Or, the stupid
recent healthcare law that the majority of the population don't want
because we were lied to about it. And then the RINOs bailing out
their favorite companies after they got their kickbacks? And this
isn't even the tip of the iceberg. It's all liberal stupidity. Notice
I didn't say Democrat or Republican? It's libtards! These folk have no
concern for their country or their fellow man. All they want is to
line their pockets and control people! Call me rude if you like! I
haven't even cracked the door on the rudeness these people have done
to all of us including many generations to follow us! And, while were
at it, how about all of those babies that will never have an
opportunity to join us? What a sickening shame! No, Travesty!
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com
<mailto:wireless...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Haven't made my point yet Lewis. But, saw enough of those that were
not in agreement with you in the thread to know that they don't
believe in "Certain Inalienable Rights" with government here only to
preserve those rights, not impose someone else's stupidity on me.
And, that the libs want someone else to take care of them all of the
time. To me, that's retarded and just plain dumb. Now that I look at
those that have their crazy position and compare that position to
their past posts on here, I now understand some of their past posts here!
I am not about to let someone shoot me during a convenience store
holdup. I will die with my 45 in hand before I let the bad guy take me
or anyone else easily. Now, to shoot someone as he is driving away
with my dvd player as more libtardiness suggested,,,, How dumb! To
take a life because someone is a thief??? That's just another liberal
ploy adage to try to make others believe that we shouldn't have those
inalienable rights. Life is precious, things, not so much! But my
life is more precious to me than to let someone else try to protect me
from halfway across the county (The Police)!
So, to make my point about your comment "People assume you are out of
salient points to make." No, I'm just trying to use a concise word
that describes all the stupidity that today's liberals have stooped
to. and libtard pretty much does that!
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Lewis Bergman
<lewis.berg...@gmail.com <mailto:lewis.berg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Come on now. Be civil. You only hurt your own argument when you resort
to name calling. People assume you are out of salient points to make.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 1:09 PM Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com
<mailto:wireless...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Especially with all thee libtard views out there today!
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:10 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller
<par...@cyberbroadband.net <mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote:
It is also a great reminder that people in other parts of the
country do not necessarily share your views.
Also a great reminder that the founders of this country really
did know what they were doing.
For things to happen in this country you have to AGREE...which
is becoming more and more difficult ;)
----- Original Message -----
*From:*Chuck McCown <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
*To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent:*Saturday, October 10, 2015 11:40 AM
*Subject:*[AFMUG] OT Guns etc
This has been fun reading.
I love this list. Folks are smart and mostly polite and
post some pretty
well reasoned arguments on both sides of almost any
issue. This is all the
social media I need.
I did want to make a comment about the Illinois FOID card.
I was a hostage in a bank robbery back in about 1993 in
Quincy Illinois.
Once it was over and I got out of the bank, I learned that
a co-worker had
suffered some kind of stress attack and was in the
hospital. That afternoon
they were out of beds in some of the areas so that took
him to the 5th
floor. That is the psych floor.
Then, it turned out, anyone that gets admitted to a psych
ward in Illinois
gets reported to the FOID people.
They revoke the FOID card.
This guy was a big time hunter. It just about killed him.
He got some pretty good press and got some political
help. Hot his card
back in about 6 weeks.
So, if you want to keep your FOID stay out of psych wards!
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
