Don’t worry, it is till the sober part of the day...
From: Ken Hohhof
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:42 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Guns etc
Yeah, stop that, you’re scaring me.
From: That One Guy /sarcasm
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 12:33 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Guns etc
I just want everyone to note that I was the adult this time
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
Agreed, it's been a fun discussion, but it would be best to stop before we go
too far and people start leaving the list. Perhaps we should have another list
for some of these off topic discussions...
And on that note, I'll shut up.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:01 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
I like arguments, heated ones are the best, but this topic has the
potential to derail what has always been a very good forum for this industry.
May I recommend it be closed before somebody gets their panties in a bunch and
this joint ends up like a dslreports forum?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com>
wrote:
++++++ 1000
Patrick Leary
Patrick Leary
Telrad
On Oct 12, 2015 11:53 AM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
Everyone wants to elect a President based on ideology (or likeability),
ignoring that the primary job is to run the executive branch. Eisenhower was
probably the last POTUS who came to the job with credentials for effectively
running a giant organization. Not saying someone can’t grow to fill the job,
look at Reagan and JFK. But seriously, Ben Carson?
I see the same mistake in the current contest to see what poor schmuck
gets to be Speaker of the House. They want to make it about ideology, and yes
it’s about getting the ideology of the majority caucus into legislation, but
the Speaker should be a get-stuff-done type, not an ideologue. People still
remember Sam Rayburn and Tip O’Neill. Hey, they could bring Newt Gingrich or
Denny Hastert out of retirement. Looks like Hastert will avoid jail time, and
he could probably use the money after paying all that hush money.
From: Patrick Leary
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 10:22 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Guns etc
Your vision of Reagan is of a cartoon character, devoid of reality,
factually ignorant, and it vastly insults his memory. Were Reagan president
today, you'd be calling him a "libtard." You are clearly under 40 years old.
Patrick Leary
Telrad
On Oct 11, 2015 5:47 PM, Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com> wrote:
Nixon was conservative, but with him trying to cover up his crooked
tail, we never saw much of anything from him. He was truly ineffective. Ford
and Bush?? Hahaha. Not conservative RINO. Reagan, a different story. He
wasn't perfect, but in his heart he held conservatism high. There is only one
way to preside and that is to work with the other side some. That's when he
had to give up his far right position some Nixon is the only conservative that
had any bearing on this country in the last 50 years. I should say
conservative bearing!
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Nixon Ford Reagan Bush...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Philip Rankin <wireless...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yes, one.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
You know we've had conservative politicians and presidents in the
last 50 years right?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Oct 11, 2015 3:52 PM, "Philip Rankin" <wireless...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Since many of you are calling me rude, how about we just reverse
that logic??? How about all of the damage the liberal logic has done to this
country in the past say 50 years???? Is that not rude? You know, actually
it's so far beyond rude, that we can't measure it anymore. Start with the
debt, the credit ratings of the country, the backdoor payoff deals, the
stupidity of laws that cover laws that should not have ever been written in the
first place. Or, the stupid recent healthcare law that the majority of the
population don't want because we were lied to about it. And then the RINOs
bailing out their favorite companies after they got their kickbacks? And this
isn't even the tip of the iceberg. It's all liberal stupidity. Notice I didn't
say Democrat or Republican? It's libtards! These folk have no concern for
their country or their fellow man. All they want is to line their pockets and
control people! Call me rude if you like! I haven't even cracked the door on
the rudeness these people have done to all of us including many generations to
follow us! And, while were at it, how about all of those babies that will
never have an opportunity to join us? What a sickening shame! No, Travesty!
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Philip Rankin
<wireless...@gmail.com> wrote:
Haven't made my point yet Lewis. But, saw enough of those that
were not in agreement with you in the thread to know that they don't believe in
"Certain Inalienable Rights" with government here only to preserve those
rights, not impose someone else's stupidity on me. And, that the libs want
someone else to take care of them all of the time. To me, that's retarded and
just plain dumb. Now that I look at those that have their crazy position and
compare that position to their past posts on here, I now understand some of
their past posts here!
I am not about to let someone shoot me during a convenience
store holdup. I will die with my 45 in hand before I let the bad guy take me
or anyone else easily. Now, to shoot someone as he is driving away with my dvd
player as more libtardiness suggested,,,, How dumb! To take a life because
someone is a thief??? That's just another liberal ploy adage to try to make
others believe that we shouldn't have those inalienable rights. Life is
precious, things, not so much! But my life is more precious to me than to let
someone else try to protect me from halfway across the county (The Police)!
So, to make my point about your comment "People assume you are
out of salient points to make." No, I'm just trying to use a concise word that
describes all the stupidity that today's liberals have stooped to. and libtard
pretty much does that!
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Lewis Bergman
<lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Come on now. Be civil. You only hurt your own argument when
you resort to name calling. People assume you are out of salient points to make.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 1:09 PM Philip Rankin
<wireless...@gmail.com> wrote:
Especially with all thee libtard views out there today!
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:10 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller
<par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
It is also a great reminder that people in other parts of
the country do not necessarily share your views.
Also a great reminder that the founders of this country
really did know what they were doing.
For things to happen in this country you have to
AGREE...which is becoming more and more difficult ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck McCown
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 11:40 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] OT Guns etc
This has been fun reading.
I love this list. Folks are smart and mostly polite
and post some pretty
well reasoned arguments on both sides of almost any
issue. This is all the
social media I need.
I did want to make a comment about the Illinois FOID
card.
I was a hostage in a bank robbery back in about 1993 in
Quincy Illinois.
Once it was over and I got out of the bank, I learned
that a co-worker had
suffered some kind of stress attack and was in the
hospital. That afternoon
they were out of beds in some of the areas so that took
him to the 5th
floor. That is the psych floor.
Then, it turned out, anyone that gets admitted to a
psych ward in Illinois
gets reported to the FOID people.
They revoke the FOID card.
This guy was a big time hunter. It just about killed
him.
He got some pretty good press and got some political
help. Hot his card
back in about 6 weeks.
So, if you want to keep your FOID stay out of psych
wards!
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
--
Philip J. Rankin
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS 66762
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
computer viruses.
************************************************************************************
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
