The one in Paris? Not near the life threatening thrill. Maybe you are
talking about another one?

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

> Try walking to the obelisk...
> Holy crap talk about a risk.
>
> *From:* Lewis Bergman <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 11, 2015 12:54 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings
>
>
> Last time I was in Paris my wife got impatient trying to find a way over
> to the Arc de Triomphe and wanted to just run across the circle. I am all
> for risky thrill seeking but not certain death.
>
> For those that haven't been there, it is in the middle of a traffic
> circle  with 12 large roads going in and out and the road must be 40 or 50
> yards wide. Traffic whirs around that thing like a cyclotron.
>
> My wife is also 5 foot and has the legs of a wobly two year old. We did
> eventually find the underground tunnels. I told her "Look at all those
> people, there must be 200 hundred of them. I can promise you out of that
> many at least 20 would still be strewn across the pavement with parts
> missing. There has to be a tunnel around here somewhere."
>
> The two nearest were hidden by those annoying street performers. I really
> don't like those people. I did get to see a guy on a moped with a bag of
> groceries and a cigarette in his mouth cut off a huge truck that I could
> swear he cleaned of the front left bumper of as he skittered by.
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2015, 10:53 AM Patrick Leary <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> It’s mesmerizing to watch the scooter traffic in Rome. A bit like red
>> blood cells jostling around in the blood stream towards some destination.
>>
>>
>>
>> Patrick Leary, Telrad
>>
>> 727-501-3735
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
>> *Sent:* Sunday, October 11, 2015 11:14 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings
>>
>>
>>
>> I love Puerto Rico because you don’t signal on lane changes on the
>> freeways.
>>
>>
>>
>> (Worst place I ever drove was Athens, Manhattan is a country road by
>> comparison).
>>
>> *From:* Patrick Leary <[email protected]>
>>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 10, 2015 4:36 PM
>>
>> *To:* [email protected]
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings
>>
>>
>>
>> I lived in Germany. There, people pay good money to earn the privilege to
>> drive. You must be 18 and it costs well over a grand. As a result, German
>> drivers are predictable. You’ll never see a German driver passing on the
>> right. You’ll never see a German driver holding up traffic in a left or
>> even middle lane. You won’t see a German change lanes without using their
>> indicator. And of course, Germans respect that government has a job and is
>> not the enemy, so they don’t reject taxation for infrastructure. As a
>> result, Germany has MUCH better roads than we do. Seriously. The German
>> autobahn is twice as thick and better banked. To be fair, we have thousands
>> of miles more of Interstate, so we do have a harder job. Still. Also, you
>> can’t drive a jalopy in Germany, which has strict inspection rules, that
>> even include aesthetics, but the emphasis is on safe functioning.
>>
>>
>>
>> We can’t realistically have the same regime though, we have much larger
>> distances and lots of backroads and farms and country roads. I think we
>> don’t need the same standard of road, but we do need roads that are
>> well-maintained, and we need much better driving skills. Our cops should
>> focus less on cherry-picking speed traps (many areas here in FL are
>> nationally famous for bullshit speed traps – e.g. Waldo, FL) and more on
>> ticketing bad drivers.
>>
>>
>>
>> Driver etiquette is the real differentiator between the U.S. and Germany.
>> A German won’t say, “I’m driving the speed limit so screw you, go around.”
>> Germans, like other Europeans, understand they have a civic responsibility.
>> Too many Americans reject civic responsibility as being “against freedom”
>> and “un-American.” The closest parallel in the U.S. to how the Germans
>> behave is the Mormon population, which places a very high premium on civic
>> responsibility, public dignity, decency, the idea of body politic as one
>> functioning unit. The concept of the Hive (ergo, Chuck’s Beehive).
>>
>>
>>
>> -          Patrick
>>
>>
>>
>> *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
>>
>>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 10, 2015 4:32 PM
>> *To:* af <[email protected]>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings
>>
>>
>>
>> What's right for one country, isn't necessarily right for another. While
>> I would love to be able to drive as fast I think is safe, knowing how the
>> typical American drives, I'd guess that it would be far more deadly here
>> than in Germany. I suspect the same logic applies to other stuff to some
>> extent.
>>
>> On Oct 10, 2015 11:05 AM, "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Countrys with weak gun control have more shot people. Simple logic in my
>> eyes.
>>
>> Nothing to say against if the majority of a country takes this into
>> account. Just strange in
>>
>> the eyes of a foreign citizen.
>>
>> In my country you can buy a BMW and drive as fast as you think it is ok
>> on highways.
>>
>> this kills, too. Same arguments here. It is the freedom to drive.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *Mike Hammett
>> *Gesendet:* Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015 16:47
>> *An:* [email protected]
>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings
>>
>>
>>
>> Except that most mass shootings are done with weapons that were obtained
>> in circumstances that even the most strict of control laws would allow. The
>> weapons painted as being so evil just plain aren't used in these situations.
>>
>> Logic doesn't lead you to gun control.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Darin Steffl" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Saturday, October 10, 2015 8:12:08 AM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings
>>
>> I carry a .380 pistol with me most of the time but I only own three guns
>> myself. I also consider myself to have many Democratic views when it comes
>> to gun policy and Republican views with taxes & business aspects.
>>
>>
>>
>> I personally think it should be MUCH harder to purchase a firearm than it
>> is. When I purchased my new glock, I ordered it online at Gander Mountain
>> and walked into the store, they did a quick background check and I walked
>> out in 10 minutes. It was great to me as a consumer and easy. BUT, what if
>> I was angry or in the heat of the moment and wanted to harm people. Now
>> that easy gun purchase allowed me to walk out the same day with a deadly
>> weapon.
>>
>>
>>
>> I do not think our government is trying to take guns away as the crazy
>> Republicans like to lie about. I do think we should have much stricter gun
>> control though to keep the nutty people from having easy access. All that
>> is going to do is make it take longer to purchase a legal firearm, which I
>> am perfectly fine with if it prevents even one shooting death or mass
>> shooting.
>>
>>
>>
>> If there's other policies being proposed that can help limit access to
>> guns, I'm all for it if it still allows me to purchase a pistol to carry
>> legally and a shotgun to go hunting. I don't believe I should be allowed to
>> own a machine gun type weapon for use at my home. Weapons like that should
>> be allowed only at shooting ranges and locked up under heavy security. They
>> do not belong at a residential home anywhere for sport or home protection.
>>
>>
>>
>> So anyway, I think there are gun nuts out there that like to walk around
>> while open carrying and say Obama is trying to steal all our guns. I think
>> they're crazy and need a bonk on the head to come to your senses. Try
>> acting normal and conceal your weapon, don't talk like a crazy gun nut and
>> try to realize you don't need a machine gun.
>>
>>
>>
>> The government's job is to protect as many citizens as possible. That
>> means more laws, more enforcement, and more compliance. We can't easily
>> identify and stop all people who will commit a shooting crime. We can more
>> easily target guns themselves and prevent the sale of them to as many "bad"
>> people as possible. For "good" and legal people who want to buy one, stop
>> complaining about gun control and embrace it in order to help save lives.
>> Gun control isn't meant for good people, only the bad people. You'll still
>> be able to buy any weapon you "need" in order to hunt or protect your home.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Freedom is not the exercise to choose whatever you want.  Heck then free
>> all the child molesters! Human beings need to be controlled, that the whole
>> reasoning behind laws.  Im with Jaime and Stefan on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> There are many items that kill more humans than first world guns.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]>
>> *To: *[email protected]
>> *Sent: *Friday, October 9, 2015 11:21:43 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings
>>
>> Looking at this with a foreign view I can't understand this "gun love" in
>> US. It is not all about the criminals or idiots. Just look at the
>> statistics for accidents with weapons. The only way to save lifes is to be
>> very restrictive. If someone wants to shoot he can go to a shooting club
>> and leave the weapon there. It is not freedom to have a gun at home. It is
>> silly esp. with kids around.
>>
>> You can't avoid killing with banning weapons but you can reduce it. If I
>> need a weapon I call for police or security.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Darin Steffl
>>
>> Minnesota WiFi
>>
>> www.mnwifi.com
>>
>> 507-634-WiFi
>>
>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
>> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals &
>> computer viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>


-- 
Lewis Bergman
325-439-0533 Cell

Reply via email to