The common names are new and designed to cover up some of that model number 
mess. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 12:17:13 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CPE Mikrotik 


this is what you refer to when you say hEX? http://routerboard.com/RB750Gr2 


as opposed to: http://routerboard.com/RB951G-2HnD 


The differences being the hex has more processor, less RAM and no wireless? 


I really like these mikrotiks, but trying to figure out specs vs part numbers 
vs common names is as confusing to me as a power tool to a woman 


On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Mathew Howard < [email protected] > wrote: 



Yep, those are direct replacements... basically the same thing, just a bit more 
powerful hardware. Sounds to me like the hEX would be perfect here. 





On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Ken Hohhof < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>




We have used the RB750G or RB750 for a business demarc device. Often with a 
routed /29 on the customer side (business IT guys are trained to ask for 5 
public IPs whether they need them or not). 

I think the hEX and hEX Lite are the replacements for those. 





From: That One Guy /sarcasm 
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 11:49 AM 


To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CPE Mikrotik 




We bridge to the router. The 2011 are all big. I only need a couple ports at 
most available to the customer on the business side in most cases as they have 
their own firewall, I would just like the CPE router (not CPE radio) to be able 
to be a part of our L3 network when the need arises. this is more a demarc 
device on those business customers, for managed routers on our contract support 
customers we do Fortigate UTMs. I dont mind two devices to keep the separation 
between church and state. Contract services is a component that could leave our 
jurisdiction and I dont want to have taken liberties on the ISP network that 
would conflict with a third party IT taking over 

An example business customer im dealing with right now is a bank. they have 3 
branches on our network A B C and two off our network D and E. We are their 
contract IT also. 

A B and C have us as their primary provider, A is their main branch. D have a 
cable connection with a DSL backup as well as a PtP t1 to A. E has cable/dsl as 
well. A B and C are all on our PmP wireless network for all intents and 
purposes (we have them on pmp solutions until saturation then move them to 
PtP), and we are turning up a 3rd party ptp fiber circuit between A and our NOC 
(they use our IP space). Our wireless having more capacity than the fiber 
contract. 

Their main branch, A gets to our noc via a licensed hop then an air fiber, each 
of those have backup 5ghz link. There is also an alt path on our network from 
the licensed link via another licensed link to our second provider (no bgp at 
present) and i am putting in an EOIP tunnel from provider 2 back to provider 1 
to be able to keep their IP space in play(it is what it is). So in essence they 
have three paths to egress with multiple redundancies. 

I am planning on MPLS between their three on network sites, hence the need for 
demarcation between us and their fortigates. 

If I can do this with a 50 dollar router that we keep on hand for residential 
CPE as well, that makes me happy. 


Is this convoluted enough? 






On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Ken Hohhof < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>




We use RB951G-2HnD. Yes it costs a few bucks more, but it’s worth it to stock 
one router, and it has been very reliable. If we were going through boatloads 
of them, I guess we might look at stocking more models to save a few bucks. 

For businesses that need more wired ports, or installations where we think we 
need external antennas, we use RB2011UiAS-2HnD-N. We also have a few CRS125 
models out there, like as a demarc for multiple tenants. 

I am debating whether to look at the new Cambium models, mainly to get an 
802.11ac product, but integrating the POE and ATA functions would simplify 
wiring for residential customers. Just not sure it would let us manage the VoIP 
function the way we like, also not sure I want to give up the outboard POE with 
surge protection. 





From: Josh Luthman 
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 10:38 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] CPE Mikrotik 




Router? Rb2011 are great and about $100. The 951 is cheaper for the residents. 





Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:19 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < 
[email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>

back looking at a cpe mikrotik, I would prefer to stock one unit for 
residential and business customers, I just dont know what can actually handle 
what reliably. 

For the residential side, not much more than the equivalent of a ubnt air 
router, at that price point, i think at one point we were paying 29 a piece for 
20 packs or something to that effect, i dont know if thats still accurate. 

on the business customer side it may need to participate in OSPF and MPLS/EOIP, 
wireless not being required. 

I would prefer Gigabit Ethernet, SPF not a requirement for the standard drop 
device. 

-- 




If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. 



</blockquote>



-- 




If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. 
</blockquote>


</blockquote>




-- 




If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. 

Reply via email to