Yeah, that is strange. Are these all LOS shots? I can't get the M2 to go through a single tree. I think it is multipathing working to our advantage because of the wider beamwidth. We don't have near the amount of trees that you have, but I have literally had to go back to every Nanobeam M2 install and swap them out because of service issues.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> wrote: > Opposite here... > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Nov 15, 2015 10:16 AM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have not been impressed with the Nanobeam M2. I see way better >> performance to a M2 Nanostation and reflector. The TX rate always suffers >> (like the link you just put in). This is in contrast to a M5 400 where I >> see better performance than a M5 Nanostation and reflector. >> >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Glen Waldrop <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I generally set them for whatever is the opposite that AP is on. >>> >>> They pretty much all come set auto out of the box and I won't find out >>> someone got a new router until they complain about the speed or latency. >>> >>> Most of them we don't have any problems, but there are always a few. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Rory Conaway <[email protected]> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Sent:* Sunday, November 15, 2015 7:15 AM >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] link problems >>> >>> When we were doing 2.4GHz, we set all the routers in the houses to >>> channel 6, no options. Then we used 1 and 11 for outdoor. >>> >>> >>> >>> Rory >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Glen Waldrop >>> *Sent:* Sunday, November 15, 2015 6:08 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] link problems >>> >>> >>> >>> I've done some playing with the routers recently. I've noticed that auto >>> almost always chooses the same channel that my customer's CPE is on. >>> >>> It appears that the router is looking for the lowest noise level, >>> ignoring the fact that the 802.11 signal is strong, but isn't registered as >>> noise. >>> >>> >>> >>> My working theory as to why *every* router on auto hits the channel that >>> feeds my customers. >>> >>> I guess one hitch is I'm running 10MHz channels now, so realistically >>> the routers shouldn't be able to see it, though I suppose the sub carriers >>> are still the same. >>> >>> If anyone has any input that'd be awesome. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> *From:* Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> >>> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> >>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 14, 2015 4:08 PM >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] link problems >>> >>> >>> >>> Customer routers used to mostly default to WiFi channel 6, but now they >>> typically are set by default to AUTO and in many cases to use an extension >>> channel, so 6+11 or 1+6. We try to change the customer’s router to a fixed >>> 20 MHz channel on channel 6, then we avoid using the middle of the band for >>> our APs. If your CPE setup is such that customers can hook up a new router >>> and it just works, over time they will migrate back to AUTO 20/40 MHz. >>> >>> >>> >>> OK, actually we avoid using 2.4 GHz anymore, but that’s what we’ve done >>> on our legacy 2.4 GHz sites. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Bill Prince <[email protected]> >>> >>> *Sent:* Saturday, November 14, 2015 4:01 PM >>> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] link problems >>> >>> >>> >>> I can't decide that for you. You really need to know what the noise is >>> like at each sector. However, when I use 10 MHz channels, I try to take >>> advantage of the fact that you're only using a 1/2 channel. You're goig to >>> get better results (most of the time) when you're at the edges. >>> >>> >>> bp >>> >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/14/2015 1:52 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>> >>> Bill >>> my other sectors at the same tower is on 6,9 should I go with 1 and 11 >>> with 10mhz? >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Bill Prince" mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Date: 11/14/15 04:41 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems >>> >>> Get it off channel 7. Poke around at the sub end and see what else is on >>> what channel. Typically, there will be less noise at channel 1 or 11. Most >>> SOHO routers are going to be on channel 6, and putting your stuff on 7 will >>> get local interference most of the time. >>> >>> >>> bp >>> >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> On 11/14/2015 1:34 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: >>> >>> >>> Josh >>> these stats are at the CPE and I even have the rf shields on the AP's >>> and the ap's are up 150ft up the air. So it sounds like I am going have to >>> probably switch it to 5ghz. >>> >>> Tim >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Josh Luthman" mailto:[email protected] >>> <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Date: 11/14/15 04:28 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems >>> >>> Looks like noise at the AP being my first thought. Assuming those stats >>> are from the CPE. >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Nov 14, 2015 4:27 PM, "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> The customer is wanting 8 meg but is only getting 3-4 meg there josh >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Date: 11/14/15 04:25 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems >>> >>> What's the problem..? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 <http://tel:937-552-2340/>937-552-2340 >>> <http://tel:937-552-2340/> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <http://tel:937-552-2343/>937-552-2343 >>> <http://tel:937-552-2343/> >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Nov 14, 2015 4:20 PM, "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Guys >>> I just installed an powerbeam m2 today at customers house and I am >>> getting: >>> >>> signal strength -61 dBm >>> noise floor -89 dBm >>> transmit CCQ 86.4% >>> tx/rx rate is around 10-39mpbs/58.5-65mbps >>> Channel width 10MHz >>> Channel/Frequency 7/2442MHz >>> Version v5.6.2 (XW) >>> from the tower to CPE is around 3.5miles >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Call >>> >>> Send SMS >>> >>> Call from mobile >>> >>> Add to Skype >>> >>> You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Call >>> >>> Send SMS >>> >>> Call from mobile >>> >>> Add to Skype >>> >>> You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
