from what google maps is showing 3-4 miles.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 11/15/15 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems

At what distance?
 

 

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Tim Reichhart 
<[email protected]> wrote:
I think my issue is my customer little ways from an hill and there is tree in 
my way plus I am only 27 ft at customer house and my tower is 150ft.




-----Original Message-----
From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 11/15/15 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems


5 GHz for LOS.
2 GHz is nearly always through a couple trees or more.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 15, 2015 10:19 AM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote:
Yeah, that is strange. Are these all LOS shots? I can't get the M2 to go 
through a single tree. I think it is multipathing working to our advantage 
because of the wider beamwidth. We don't have near the amount of trees that you 
have, but I have literally had to go back to every Nanobeam M2 install and swap 
them out because of service issues.
 
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Opposite here...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 15, 2015 10:16 AM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> 
wrote:
I have not been impressed with the Nanobeam M2. I see way better performance to 
a M2 Nanostation and reflector. The TX rate always suffers (like the link you 
just put in). This is in contrast to a M5 400 where I see better performance 
than a M5 Nanostation and reflector.
 
 On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Glen Waldrop <[email protected]> wrote:

 
I generally set them for whatever is the opposite that AP is on.

They pretty much all come set auto out of the box and I won't find out someone 
got a new router until they complain about the speed or latency.

Most of them we don't have any problems, but there are always a few.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
 From: Rory Conaway 
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 7:15 AM
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems



When we were doing 2.4GHz, we set all the routers in the houses to channel 6, 
no options. Then we used 1 and 11 for outdoor.
 
Rory
 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 6:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems

 
I've done some playing with the routers recently. I've noticed that auto almost 
always chooses the same channel that my customer's CPE is on.

It appears that the router is looking for the lowest noise level, ignoring the 
fact that the 802.11 signal is strong, but isn't registered as noise.

 

My working theory as to why *every* router on auto hits the channel that feeds 
my customers.

I guess one hitch is I'm running 10MHz channels now, so realistically the 
routers shouldn't be able to see it, though I suppose the sub carriers are 
still the same.

If anyone has any input that'd be awesome.

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Ken Hohhof 

To: [email protected] 

Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 4:08 PM

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems

 

Customer routers used to mostly default to WiFi channel 6, but now they 
typically are set by default to AUTO and in many cases to use an extension 
channel, so 6+11 or 1+6. We try to change the customer's router to a fixed 20 
MHz channel on channel 6, then we avoid using the middle of the band for our 
APs. If your CPE setup is such that customers can hook up a new router and it 
just works, over time they will migrate back to AUTO 20/40 MHz.

 

OK, actually we avoid using 2.4 GHz anymore, but that's what we've done on our 
legacy 2.4 GHz sites.

 

 

From: Bill Prince 

Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 4:01 PM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems
 
 

 
 

I can't decide that for you. You really need to know what the noise is like at 
each sector. However, when I use 10 MHz channels, I try to take advantage of 
the fact that you're only using a 1/2 channel. You're goig to get better 
results (most of the time) when you're at the edges.



bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
 
On 11/14/2015 1:52 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:

Bill
my other sectors at the same tower is on 6,9 should I go with 1 and 11 with 
10mhz?

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: "Bill Prince" mailto:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 11/14/15 04:41 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems

Get it off channel 7. Poke around at the sub end and see what else is on what 
channel. Typically, there will be less noise at channel 1 or 11. Most SOHO 
routers are going to be on channel 6, and putting your stuff on 7 will get 
local interference most of the time.



bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/14/2015 1:34 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
 

Josh
these stats are at the CPE and I even have the rf shields on the AP's and the 
ap's are up 150ft up the air. So it sounds like I am going have to probably 
switch it to 5ghz.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: "Josh Luthman" mailto:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 11/14/15 04:28 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems
Looks like noise at the AP being my first thought. Assuming those stats are 
from the CPE.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 14, 2015 4:27 PM, "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> wrote:
The customer is wanting 8 meg but is only getting 3-4 meg there josh

-----Original Message-----
From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: 11/14/15 04:25 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] link problems
What's the problem..?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 14, 2015 4:20 PM, "Tim Reichhart" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello Guys
I just installed an powerbeam m2 today at customers house and I am getting:

signal strength -61 dBm
noise floor -89 dBm
transmit CCQ 86.4%
tx/rx rate is around 10-39mpbs/58.5-65mbps
Channel width 10MHz
Channel/Frequency 7/2442MHz
Version v5.6.2 (XW)
from the tower to CPE is around 3.5miles





  


Call

Send SMS

Call from mobile

Add to Skype

You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype 
  
  

  

  
Call

Send SMS

Call from mobile

Add to Skype

 You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype 
  
  

  

  
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 


Call
Send SMS
Call from mobile
Add to Skype
You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype 
 
 
 
 
Call
Send SMS
Call from mobile
Add to Skype
You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype



Reply via email to