Explain to wife it was justified On Dec 11, 2015 10:56 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hell even running Cat5 cable in some parts of Southern NM requires > licensed electrician > On Dec 11, 2015 10:42 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, thats the problem I run into at elevators, they dont go by code. >> Panels with 110 on one phase, 65 on another. I assume its caused by tying a >> sub panel into a 3phase with a problematic motor >> >> Most of them have approved us doing the work. the 1200 dollar bill for an >> electrician to run a 120 foot conduit circuit is what pushed this >> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:28 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> For the bigger outfits, we don't want the liability, so we pay their >>> electrician. And usually everything has to be in rigid or aluminum. For the >>> smaller guys, we ask how they want it done. Most of the time they don't >>> care, so we just do it and follow code. You have to keep in mind that >>> you're going to run into lots of 3-phase, possible weird configurations and >>> sub panels all over the place. >>> >>> >>> On 12/11/2015 11:15 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>> >>> Without getting into the licensing details >>> Im getting more freedom to touch the service side at our sites >>> Im a really handy home wiring guy, overly cautious >>> >>> In illinois or online, does anybody know of a basic competency program >>> for electrical? If I was going to do a full training, id tell my boss to >>> punch sand and go be a union electrician, so im not looking at that. >>> >>> Liability may not allow for a program like this to exist, I just dont >>> want to blow a grain elevator up because I didnt know something (not overly >>> concerned considering some of the wiring at the elevators we operate at) >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >
