Is 7-11 years how long it takes to cash on out on a box of smokes and a slurpee?

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
> even at 7-11 years, that isn't that unreasonable, since they should have
> quite a bit longer life span than that... and you don't need any storage
> with a grid-tie system.
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Did you buy it wholesale and build it yourself?  The average installation
>> commercially or through any of the solar companies is 7-11 years.  Also,
>> what are you doing for storage?
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 11:43 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>>
>>
>>
>> I love my solar panels and the payback is about 4 years.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Rory Conaway
>>
>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 11:15 AM
>>
>> To: [email protected]
>>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>>
>>
>>
>> The two biggest problems with Wind Farms besides the eyesore (actually I
>> think they look cool) is noise and bird deaths.  Never been a fan of them
>> though.
>>
>>
>>
>> Right now I’m against taxpayer subsidized solar for three reasons, the ROI
>> is ridiculous, and better/cheaper technologies are right around the corner
>> (100 times cheaper and ROI’s of months, not years), and there is no
>> cost-effective storage medium that is going to last more than a few years
>> (Lithium batteries are expensive and will fail within 3-8 years or at least
>> be heavily degraded).  When Perovskite panels come out with sodium batteries
>> or one of several other technologies that don’t start degrading after 18
>> months, I’m onboard.
>>
>>
>>
>> As for people against technology that could better their lives.  I’m more
>> worried about the ones that won’t teach proven science for religious
>> reasons.  You can teach science and morality without ignoring the science.
>> Tolerance of ignorance never a good thing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 9:58 AM
>> To: af
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as I can see all the crazy sucking the energy up and causing cancer
>> type comments all came from two people (who were not council members)... who
>> happen to share the same last name.
>>
>> It sounds like the reason they voted to reject it was because the
>> residents didn't want it there... which is kind of the town council should
>> be doing, whether their reasons for wanting it there are logical or not
>> isn't entirely relevant. Most of the objections appear to have been that it
>> would be an eyesore... on the other hand, if the majority of the residents
>> did want it to happen, and the town council was just persuaded to turn it
>> down because of a couple of nutcases ranting, they should (and probably
>> will) be voted out in the next election.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Jay Weekley <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I really didn't gather the full reason they banned the solar farm from the
>> article.  True, two citizens that made comments were nuts but you find that
>> anywhere.
>>
>> Patrick Leary wrote:
>>
>>
>> Even worse Rory, because then you have many people who claim to know the
>> meaning of these labels but they are simply incorrect and are repeating
>> sound bites, and/or misapply them as a matter of course, even in
>> contradiction without a trace of irony.
>>
>> …e.g., “Obama is a follower of Reverend Wright!!!,” but is also a Kenyan
>> born Muslim.
>>
>> Go figure. It’s the death of critical thinking in this country. It has
>> spawned lots of ignorance. Did you know an elected city zoning board in
>> Woodland, NC just banned a solar farm on the grounds that it would steal too
>> much of the sun’s energy, thus putting photosynthesis of plants and crops at
>> risk? Yeah, that just happened in the U.S.A….in 2015.
>>
>>
>> http://www.roanoke-chowannewsherald.com/2015/12/08/woodland-rejects-solar-farm/
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway
>> *Sent:* Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:32 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>>
>> I think that was misunderstood.  My point was, regardless of the
>> candidates, is that the vast majority of voters simply don’t know the facts,
>> don’t care about the facts, and are not prepared to provide a vote that is
>> based on research and education.  I can ask 10 people what the Trans Pacific
>> Partnership was about and 10 of them won’t have a clue. Show a picture of
>> Biden to 10 people and I’d be surprised if 8 of them recognize him and his
>> position in the government. Most of them don’t have any idea of our
>> country’s history, could tell you the difference between Democracy,
>> Socialism, and Communism, or even know who fought in World Wars, the Civil
>> War, or even which side won.  The fact is, even with all the resources
>> available to the public today, the average voter is more ignorant today than
>> in the past.  The all know the Kardashians but few of them could name off
>> their Senators or Congressman.  This isn’t partisan, this is the state of
>> our country today.  Picking out supporters of any candidate for being
>> ignorant is trite when the entire electorate is clueless.
>>
>> Rory
>>
>> *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
>> *Sent:* Sunday, December 13, 2015 6:19 PM
>> *To:* Animal Farm
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>>
>> Not trying to offend anyone  on list....I get kick out of all mayhem on
>> news...but if you do get offended....I can only say.   If the  shoe
>> fits...don't take it off.
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2015 6:08 PM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> It's actually a sign of great intelligence to simultaneously hold two
>> opposite opinions at the same time.
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 12/13/2015 5:02 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>
>>     I think calling people ignorant because they support an opposing
>>     candidate is over simplification and pretty ignorant itself.
>>     Trump is appealing to the base fears and anger for a large number
>>     of people who believe nobody else is addressing th those concerns.
>>     I had to laugh today. I saw  some consultant interviewing a bunch
>>     Trump supporters. Some lady said she didn't like Obama because he
>>     was arrogant and thought to much of himself. I thought, "wait a
>>     second. You are a trump supporter?" Doesn't Trump have nearly the
>>     entire market cornered on that trait?
>>
>>     On Sun, Dec 13, 2015, 6:50 PM Jaime Solorza
>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         And I like  Mickey Mouse's voice much better compared to Cruz
>>         or Trumps...
>>
>>         On Dec 13, 2015 5:44 PM, "Jaime Solorza"
>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>         wrote:
>>
>>         Lets fact check Rory....lol
>>
>>         On Dec 13, 2015 5:03 PM, "Rory Conaway"
>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         Really, and Hillary supporters don’t even acknowledge she sold
>>         influence in that State Department for billions and took
>>         hundreds of millions for bogus speeches. All candidates have
>>         followers that really don’t know what’s going on so singling
>>         out Trump is bogus if you don’t add the voters who thought
>>         Obama was going to pay their mortgage (that was a real
>>         Einstein moment).  With 90% of the people not even knowing who
>>         the vice-president is, you can always find idiots who will
>>         vote for Mickey Mouse if he said he was for some hot political
>>         topic.
>>
>>         Rory
>>
>>         *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
>>         *Sent:* Sunday, December 13, 2015 3:10 PM
>>         *To:* Animal Farm
>>         *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>>
>>         The scary  thing Stefan is not Trump as much as his
>>         followers...when they are interviewed it reminds how narrow
>>         minded they are...they think professional wrestling is real
>>         among other things  but I might offend some on list...
>>
>>         On Dec 13, 2015 2:26 PM, "Stefan Englhardt" <[email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         I said foreign view :-). We have very different laws and
>>         thoughts on privacy. Our politicians are allowed to keep more
>>         privacy. In such a case the private emails would not be open
>>         to a broad audience. I did not say she followed US rules.
>>
>>         -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>>         Von: Lewis Bergman <[email protected]
>>         <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>         Datum: 13.12.2015 21:40 (GMT+01:00)
>>         An: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>         Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
>> viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
>> viruses.
>>
>> ************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to