In Mikrotik you use something like 512mb for your first provider and then
768mb for your second provider.  A gig should be good, but two is better.
I'm talking full routes.

What router do you have, TJ?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote:

> Full routes means that you see all routes your providers pass on.  It can
> be a large list but it does give you the best view outbound.   As long as
> you have the memory and CPU to handle it there isn’t really any reason not
> to take it.  Even with ‘full routes’ you usually don’t want to take
> anything more specific than a /24
>
> Partial routes limits the prefix length you see to cut down on the amount
> of memory and routes you see.   You won’t see the optimal route (not that
> BGP path is truly optimal anyway) but you should still be able to reach the
> vast majority of destinations even without a default route since there is
> normally a less specific ‘covering’ prefix.  A /22 filter with a default
> route cuts down on the number of routes significantly.  A /20 further
> reduces the routes.
>
> Default route is just that - a place to send traffic when you don’t have a
> route in the routing table.  Perhaps because you filtered it out.  It sends
> the traffic to your upstreams router for them to deal with.  If they don’t
> have a route then it gets dumped.  The default route really just changes
> where the traffic dies - before or after it leaves your network.
>
> ‘best’ is probably full routes, if you have hardware that can handle it.
> If not then filter prefixes to match what the hardware can do.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2016, at 9:14 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:
>
> I'm a complete idiot and I just turned up 2 upstreams, butch Evans will be
> setting up the bgp, he said I can take full routes, partial router /20 and
> larger or default routes, anyone able to tell me the best choice and the
> pros and cons of each ?
>
> Thanks a million
>
>
>

Reply via email to