I have a 732 doing BGP. It gets both peers (full routes) done in like 2 minutes. Newer routers, I expect, are faster.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > Dennis, does that help the time to be back up and routing traffic after a > router reboot or loss of connectivity? So you start using the default > route as soon as you get it, and then get more specific as the routing > table fills? That’s something that I’ve heard horror stories about, taking > like 15 minutes to be back up and running after a router reboot or a loss > of connectivity to the BGP peer. With a default route, I’m used to that > being pretty much instantaneous. > > > *From:* Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2016 9:52 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Single homed to multi, full partial or default > route ? > > > You have your upstream send default+full, you can discard what you don’t > need, then if you need something, you don’t have to call them, just change > your filters. > > > > Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. > > [email protected] – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *TJ Trout > *Sent:* Thursday, January 21, 2016 8:15 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Single homed to multi, full partial or default route ? > > > > I'm a complete idiot and I just turned up 2 upstreams, butch Evans will be > setting up the bgp, he said I can take full routes, partial router /20 and > larger or default routes, anyone able to tell me the best choice and the > pros and cons of each ? > > Thanks a million >
