*nods* My Chicago routers process feeds in about 30 seconds.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 10:20:12 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Single homed to multi, full partial or default route ? I have a 732 doing BGP. It gets both peers (full routes) done in like 2 minutes. Newer routers, I expect, are faster. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ken Hohhof < af...@kwisp.com > wrote: Dennis, does that help the time to be back up and routing traffic after a router reboot or loss of connectivity? So you start using the default route as soon as you get it, and then get more specific as the routing table fills? That’s something that I’ve heard horror stories about, taking like 15 minutes to be back up and running after a router reboot or a loss of connectivity to the BGP peer. With a default route, I’m used to that being pretty much instantaneous. From: Dennis Burgess Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 9:52 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Single homed to multi, full partial or default route ? You have your upstream send default+full, you can discard what you don’t need, then if you need something, you don’t have to call them, just change your filters. Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of TJ Trout Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 8:15 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Single homed to multi, full partial or default route ? I'm a complete idiot and I just turned up 2 upstreams, butch Evans will be setting up the bgp, he said I can take full routes, partial router /20 and larger or default routes, anyone able to tell me the best choice and the pros and cons of each ? Thanks a million
