Wouldn't it be way cheaper and easier to use Chuck's condom radome? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 23, 2016 9:38 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote:
> We've been putting radomes on ALL of the Force200's. > > Would be nice if they could come up with a sync-over-power variant of the > 200. > > ..... or let us order the 450d radome w/ sub-reflector element. The > Force110 and 450d is the same reflector.. and feed. > > Just sayin. > > On 2/23/2016 8:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Why go through the effort of replacing them? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Feb 23, 2016 9:31 PM, "Brandon Yuchasz" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not exactly what you are asking but we have done a lot of 10 to 12 mile >> links with the stock force 110 and got full modulation. I have not put up >> the force 200 yet but plan to start replacing all the force 110 links with >> them as soon as the weather warms a bit. The old 110s will become backup >> links. >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Brandon Yuchasz >> >> GogebicRange.net >> >> www.gogebicrange.net >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Joseph Marsh >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2016 5:32 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Fw: Force 200 Ptp distance >> >> >> >> Thanks for the info Mathew ... I don't like more than 10 miles. But was >> curious at 20 >> >> On Feb 23, 2016 5:28 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yeah - 40 miles appears to be the max for ePMP. Realistically, it >> *should* be possible to get full modulation at 8 miles with Force 200's, >> but at 20 miles, you're going to want bigger dishes. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> As a non smart-ass answer, there are probably some timing constraints >> that will limit the distance before the RF will, assuming LOS. >> >> >> >> *From:* Chuck McCown <[email protected]> >> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2016 3:47 PM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Force 200 Ptp distance >> >> >> >> I think earth curvature will probably be the limiting factor. >> >> >> >> *From:* Joseph Marsh <[email protected]> >> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2016 3:45 PM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Force 200 Ptp distance >> >> >> >> What is the max distance for a force 200 Ptp link? >> >> >> > >
