yes, since tuesday, there was a memo On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:
> We are? since when? :P > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:03 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> he asked us not to, and we are all very polite here >> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Josh Luthman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Is no one going to ask why he needs it?!?!?! >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:26 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> stack em >>>> >>>> http://www.grainger.com/product/6NZY1?gclid=Cj0KEQjw8u23BRCg6YnzmJmPqYgBEiQALf_XzQgSIXhjTG4TIL4kOUU_DbDVvNyiOxvk2dOmAQBwxNkaAjOK8P8HAQ&cm_mmc=PPC:GOOGLEPLAA-_-Fasteners-_-Spacers%20and%20Standoffs-_-6NZY1&AL!2966!3!50916684477!!!g!65506925021!&ef_id=VjevfgAAAa3mIFB@:20160330152628:s >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:25 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> would something as small as 10-32 at 6 inches support the weigt >>>>> without bending at the thread? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think even here in the US, square holes and M6 cage nuts and screws >>>>>> are pretty much standard. At least in data centers. Telco might still >>>>>> use >>>>>> 12-24. >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> >>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2016 9:45 PM >>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Super long rack screw >>>>>> >>>>>> I've seen lots of M6 in the stuff from China, and of course 12-24 and >>>>>> 10-32 from US sources... But never M5. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Rack screw can be 10-32, 12-24, M5, M6. And rack rail can be >>>>>>> threaded, round hole, square hole. Too many options. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Cassidy B. Larson >>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 9:24 PM >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Super long rack screw >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know on Cisco switches you could turn the ears around and the >>>>>>> holes would line up so you’d get more switch in front of the rails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 29, 2016, at 8:22 PM, Sterling Jacobson <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's a good idea. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If there are not holes, is there a small screw type that is short >>>>>>>> and self-tapping? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not sure the best way to mount the ears if the holes for the ears >>>>>>>> don't exist on the switch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 8:10 PM >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Super long rack screw >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Add mounting ears farther back on the switch. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Sterling Jacobson >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 7:57 PM >>>>>>>> To: '[email protected]' >>>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Super long rack screw >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is really specific; don't ask why I need it :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But I need a standard rack threaded screw that looks like a 6 to 7 >>>>>>>> inch long motherboard standoff screw. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So it would stand a 1U switch forward from the 19" rack about 6-7 >>>>>>>> inches. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I tried standard rack standoff modules, but the space is too >>>>>>>> limiting. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
