No, I got the memo about the TPS report...
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:53 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > yes, since tuesday, there was a memo > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> We are? since when? :P >> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:03 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> he asked us not to, and we are all very polite here >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Josh Luthman < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Is no one going to ask why he needs it?!?!?! >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:26 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> stack em >>>>> >>>>> http://www.grainger.com/product/6NZY1?gclid=Cj0KEQjw8u23BRCg6YnzmJmPqYgBEiQALf_XzQgSIXhjTG4TIL4kOUU_DbDVvNyiOxvk2dOmAQBwxNkaAjOK8P8HAQ&cm_mmc=PPC:GOOGLEPLAA-_-Fasteners-_-Spacers%20and%20Standoffs-_-6NZY1&AL!2966!3!50916684477!!!g!65506925021!&ef_id=VjevfgAAAa3mIFB@:20160330152628:s >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:25 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> would something as small as 10-32 at 6 inches support the weigt >>>>>> without bending at the thread? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think even here in the US, square holes and M6 cage nuts and >>>>>>> screws are pretty much standard. At least in data centers. Telco might >>>>>>> still use 12-24. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> >>>>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2016 9:45 PM >>>>>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Super long rack screw >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've seen lots of M6 in the stuff from China, and of course 12-24 >>>>>>> and 10-32 from US sources... But never M5. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rack screw can be 10-32, 12-24, M5, M6. And rack rail can be >>>>>>>> threaded, round hole, square hole. Too many options. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Cassidy B. Larson >>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 9:24 PM >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Super long rack screw >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I know on Cisco switches you could turn the ears around and the >>>>>>>> holes would line up so you’d get more switch in front of the rails. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 29, 2016, at 8:22 PM, Sterling Jacobson < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's a good idea. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If there are not holes, is there a small screw type that is short >>>>>>>>> and self-tapping? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not sure the best way to mount the ears if the holes for the ears >>>>>>>>> don't exist on the switch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 8:10 PM >>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Super long rack screw >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Add mounting ears farther back on the switch. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: Sterling Jacobson >>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 7:57 PM >>>>>>>>> To: '[email protected]' >>>>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] Super long rack screw >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is really specific; don't ask why I need it :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But I need a standard rack threaded screw that looks like a 6 to 7 >>>>>>>>> inch long motherboard standoff screw. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So it would stand a 1U switch forward from the 19" rack about 6-7 >>>>>>>>> inches. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I tried standard rack standoff modules, but the space is too >>>>>>>>> limiting. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
