Lol. You Crack me up Qwerty w + On Wed, Jun 1, 2016, 3:52 PM Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ouch. Don’t make me bring Trumpism’s in to defend my manhood. Little > Rubio already tried that and got crushed. Now he’s groveling to get back > in Trump’s good graces. I’m just saying…. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 1, 2016 1:41 PM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Seems legit > > > > Is that Rory? > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016, 2:54 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Spotted at Bikes and Blues Festival this weekend flapping his lack of > manhood around... > > On Jun 1, 2016 10:29 AM, "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Vermin Supreme will promise him a pony. He’ll have to brush his teeth > though. > > > > *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2016 11:15 AM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Seems legit > > > > Man, thats a good, point, I should take that to management, we dont want > to come across like rip off artists. Thats only like .3% of the day so it > would be unfair to expect them to pay for the unused 99.7%. Boy, we almost > look greedier than the presumptive GOP nominee > > > > :-) > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > $39/month is pretty steep, don’t you think? If the iPads are being used > for POS - credit cards take, what, five seconds to process? Say they do > sixty transactions a day which means they’re using the internet for a total > of five minutes. You’re going to charge someone $39/month for only using > the internet for FIVE MINUTES a day? > > > > Kappa > > > > Chris Wright > > Network Administrator > > Velociter Wireless > > 209-838-1221 x115 > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2016 9:00 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Seems legit > > > > Sounds like a very high maintenance customer for no more than he's > probably going to want to pay. Also, he wants a residential plan? Really? > This is quite clearly a business situation. > > On Wednesday, June 1, 2016, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I would say 150k sq foot wireless coverage between 42 buildings for 39 > bucks a month is a pretty fair deal. This is the request that came in to us. > > > > > > XXXX has a business location in XXXX at another address that he has > questions about getting service for. It is at XXXX. It's a shed he rents > from someone and he would like internet to cover his office, a toolshed, > and up to 40 outside of his buildings since he's going to use iPads and > barcodes everywhere. Up to 2 1/2-3 1/2 acres he needs covered. He's tried > XXXX and they weren't working well. He wants to use us for POS system. He > said he's more interested in residential plans than business because he > doesn't need the other features as he gets them from whoever supports his > POS. He doesn't want to sign up until he knows the cost of what his > monthly/annual service would be. > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > >
