So which part of this statement are you being sarcastic about? I'm confused now.....
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 9:44 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > I hope im not coming across as thinking this guy is anywhere near his > right mind in his expectations > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:26 AM, David <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you are only looking at the actual usages yes this looks great, but >> what about how much time will used to maintain said such infrastructure and >> the infrastructure it attaches to. >> So, Yes I would be looking for more on a monthly rate. >> Especially if I deployed it and installed it. Of course you could give a >> $10.00 charge for service access only and a $100.00 monthly maint contract. >> Or apply a contract where they pay each time a truck is rolled. >> >> >> On 06/01/2016 11:15 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >> >> Man, thats a good, point, I should take that to management, we dont want >> to come across like rip off artists. Thats only like .3% of the day so it >> would be unfair to expect them to pay for the unused 99.7%. Boy, we almost >> look greedier than the presumptive GOP nominee >> >> :-) >> >> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Chris Wright <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> $39/month is pretty steep, don’t you think? If the iPads are being used >>> for POS - credit cards take, what, five seconds to process? Say they do >>> sixty transactions a day which means they’re using the internet for a total >>> of five minutes. You’re going to charge someone $39/month for only using >>> the internet for FIVE MINUTES a day? >>> >>> >>> >>> Kappa >>> >>> >>> >>> Chris Wright >>> >>> Network Administrator >>> >>> Velociter Wireless >>> >>> 209-838-1221 x115 <209-838-1221%20x115> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2016 9:00 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Seems legit >>> >>> >>> >>> Sounds like a very high maintenance customer for no more than he's >>> probably going to want to pay. Also, he wants a residential plan? Really? >>> This is quite clearly a business situation. >>> >>> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I would say 150k sq foot wireless coverage between 42 buildings for 39 >>> bucks a month is a pretty fair deal. This is the request that came in to us. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> XXXX has a business location in XXXX at another address that he has >>> questions about getting service for. It is at XXXX. It's a shed he rents >>> from someone and he would like internet to cover his office, a toolshed, >>> and up to 40 outside of his buildings since he's going to use iPads and >>> barcodes everywhere. Up to 2 1/2-3 1/2 acres he needs covered. He's tried >>> XXXX and they weren't working well. He wants to use us for POS system. He >>> said he's more interested in residential plans than business because he >>> doesn't need the other features as he gets them from whoever supports his >>> POS. He doesn't want to sign up until he knows the cost of what his >>> monthly/annual service would be. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > -- *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
