Same. I was being completely facetious. Chris Wright Network Administrator Velociter Wireless 209-838-1221 x115
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 8:45 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seems legit I hope im not coming across as thinking this guy is anywhere near his right mind in his expectations On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:26 AM, David <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: If you are only looking at the actual usages yes this looks great, but what about how much time will used to maintain said such infrastructure and the infrastructure it attaches to. So, Yes I would be looking for more on a monthly rate. Especially if I deployed it and installed it. Of course you could give a $10.00 charge for service access only and a $100.00 monthly maint contract. Or apply a contract where they pay each time a truck is rolled. On 06/01/2016 11:15 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: Man, thats a good, point, I should take that to management, we dont want to come across like rip off artists. Thats only like .3% of the day so it would be unfair to expect them to pay for the unused 99.7%. Boy, we almost look greedier than the presumptive GOP nominee :-) On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Chris Wright <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: $39/month is pretty steep, don’t you think? If the iPads are being used for POS - credit cards take, what, five seconds to process? Say they do sixty transactions a day which means they’re using the internet for a total of five minutes. You’re going to charge someone $39/month for only using the internet for FIVE MINUTES a day? Kappa Chris Wright Network Administrator Velociter Wireless 209-838-1221 x115<tel:209-838-1221%20x115> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2016 9:00 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Seems legit Sounds like a very high maintenance customer for no more than he's probably going to want to pay. Also, he wants a residential plan? Really? This is quite clearly a business situation. On Wednesday, June 1, 2016, That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I would say 150k sq foot wireless coverage between 42 buildings for 39 bucks a month is a pretty fair deal. This is the request that came in to us. XXXX has a business location in XXXX at another address that he has questions about getting service for. It is at XXXX. It's a shed he rents from someone and he would like internet to cover his office, a toolshed, and up to 40 outside of his buildings since he's going to use iPads and barcodes everywhere. Up to 2 1/2-3 1/2 acres he needs covered. He's tried XXXX and they weren't working well. He wants to use us for POS system. He said he's more interested in residential plans than business because he doesn't need the other features as he gets them from whoever supports his POS. He doesn't want to sign up until he knows the cost of what his monthly/annual service would be. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
