UBNT is supposed to be coming out with PRISM-AC on 2.4. Will be interesting to see how it does. On Jun 2, 2016 4:49 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Your welcome, I guess? =) > > I'd rather be proving you wrong so we can gut Ubnt 2.4 and put up ePMP 2.4. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:47 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Thank you for proving my point ;) >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 4:09 PM >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >> >> No...it's not. The EPMP 2.4 radios just suck at penetration. I've done >> Ubnt KPP and IT Elite - they all performed terribly. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:59 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure with ubnt we're using kp >>> performance. With epmp, i think it is bundled antennas... >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>> >>> Jay, I suspect the difference you are seeing may be mainly in the >>> antennas. 2.4 GHz from any vendor should penetrate the same, the radio >>> waves don’t care what brand radio launched them. And I think the >>> difference between the platforms will be most evident in low interference >>> environment where they can achieve their full modulation and throughput. >>> With low SNR, I think it’s kind of like arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for off >>> road racing, neither will be able to show off its capabilities. Receiver >>> sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz won’t matter. >>> >>> >>> *From:* CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>> >>> >>> Also interested in interference rejection of the pmp450 - is there any >>> (in 2.4) >>> we are getting better foliage penetration with ubnt 2.4 than epmp 2.4 - >>> - and from the performance of >>> the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it penetrated better! >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Matt <[email protected]> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:25 PM >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>> >>> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and >>> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >>> have not deployed more then couple test links. >>> >>> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences >>> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >>> >>> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >>> >>> >> >
