Epmp is like 6 dB less power? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 6, 2016 10:47 AM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The only direct comparison I've seen with the same antennas at the AP was > the one Jerry Head mentioned here... and he wasn't able to confirm that TX > power was the same. > > The other thing that I'm wondering about is if the fact that the Cambium > sectors are dual slant instead of H/V has something to do with it. > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Someone asked whether the xmt power was apples-to-apples, has that been >> answered? >> >> If the antennas are comparable, it would seem the only explanations for >> different rcv signal would be xmt power, or calibration error. >> >> >> *From:* Chuck McCown <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Monday, June 06, 2016 8:18 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >> >> I think if I was cambium, I would have a couple of guys on a plane or in >> a car with a suitcase of equipment to visit you in the field. >> This was not the intended or expected outcome for that product. >> >> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Sunday, June 05, 2016 8:17 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >> >> >> Never really left. I would have to lose customers with epmp 2.4 wifi due >> to lack of signal. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> On Jun 5, 2016 10:12 PM, "Paul McCall" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So you went back to UBNT in 2.4? >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >> *Sent:* Sunday, June 5, 2016 9:57 PM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >> >> >> >> No. I have no pmp450 in my network simply due to cost. >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Josh, >> >> >> >> Have you tried 450 2.4 in the exact situation where ePMP 2.4 “sucked”? >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 2, 2016 5:10 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >> >> >> >> No...it's not. The EPMP 2.4 radios just suck at penetration. I've done >> Ubnt KPP and IT Elite - they all performed terribly. >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:59 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure with ubnt we're using kp >> performance. With epmp, i think it is bundled antennas... >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> *From:* Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >> >> >> >> Jay, I suspect the difference you are seeing may be mainly in the >> antennas. 2.4 GHz from any vendor should penetrate the same, the radio >> waves don’t care what brand radio launched them. And I think the >> difference between the platforms will be most evident in low interference >> environment where they can achieve their full modulation and throughput. >> With low SNR, I think it’s kind of like arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for off >> road racing, neither will be able to show off its capabilities. Receiver >> sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz won’t matter. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> >> >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >> >> >> >> >> >> Also interested in interference rejection of the pmp450 - is there any >> (in 2.4) >> >> we are getting better foliage penetration with ubnt 2.4 than epmp 2.4 - - >> and from the performance of >> >> the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it penetrated better! >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> *From:* Matt <[email protected]> >> >> *To:* [email protected] >> >> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:25 PM >> >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >> >> >> >> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and >> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >> have not deployed more then couple test links. >> >> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences >> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >> >> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >> >> >> >> >> >> >
