Double Lolz On Jun 2, 2016 10:30 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
> UBNT is supposed to be coming out with PRISM-AC on 2.4. Will be > interesting to see how it does. > On Jun 2, 2016 4:49 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Your welcome, I guess? =) >> >> I'd rather be proving you wrong so we can gut Ubnt 2.4 and put up ePMP >> 2.4. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 5:47 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you for proving my point ;) >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 4:09 PM >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>> >>> No...it's not. The EPMP 2.4 radios just suck at penetration. I've done >>> Ubnt KPP and IT Elite - they all performed terribly. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:59 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure with ubnt we're using kp >>>> performance. With epmp, i think it is bundled antennas... >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> *From:* Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>>> >>>> Jay, I suspect the difference you are seeing may be mainly in the >>>> antennas. 2.4 GHz from any vendor should penetrate the same, the radio >>>> waves don’t care what brand radio launched them. And I think the >>>> difference between the platforms will be most evident in low interference >>>> environment where they can achieve their full modulation and throughput. >>>> With low SNR, I think it’s kind of like arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for off >>>> road racing, neither will be able to show off its capabilities. Receiver >>>> sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz won’t matter. >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>>> >>>> >>>> Also interested in interference rejection of the pmp450 - is there any >>>> (in 2.4) >>>> we are getting better foliage penetration with ubnt 2.4 than epmp 2.4 - >>>> - and from the performance of >>>> the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it penetrated better! >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> *From:* Matt <[email protected]> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:25 PM >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP >>>> >>>> We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and >>>> some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far >>>> have not deployed more then couple test links. >>>> >>>> For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences >>>> you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? >>>> >>>> For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? >>>> >>>> >>> >>
