I don't think it would be possible to meet the equivalent of ETSI class 3 with such a small antenna... They could easily (from a regulatory standpoint) allow higher Tx power for 24 GHz unlicensed FDD or TDD links if the antennas met a criteria of certain sidelobe dB falloff at specific number of degrees off azimuth, which could only be met by a 60cm/2ft diameter dish.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:00 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > Be careful what you wish for. Remember that the Tx antenna on the AF24 is > smaller/wider beam. > > On 7/25/2016 6:46 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > > Naturally it's better than an AF24 (or even AF24HD) since the 24 band is > limited to +0 Tx power... > > I would be really happy if the FCC and IC would permit 24 GHz unlicensed > PTP with higher Tx power, if they put a firm limitation on the quality of > antennas for sidelobes and f/b ratio at least meeting ETSI class 3 > requirements. > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:32 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > >> We have an ExtendAir G2 18Ghz at 2.5 miles on 2' dishes to a 100Mbps >> enterprise customer. It's definitely better than an AF24 in the rain. Of >> course it's at -34dBm RSL, too. I'm not real happy with Exalt and the G2 >> failures we've had, but this pair has been fine for the most part. >> >> To go 4.3 miles, perhaps make one end a 3' dish? >> >> On 7/25/2016 5:05 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: >> >> ExtendAir G2? >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Sam Lambie <samtaos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Exalt for the 23 gig gear. I think our cost was around 6500. >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Jaime Fink <ja...@mimosa.co> wrote: >>> >>>> B5c in 4.9 GHz is Part 90 Subpart Y certified, should get you 200 Mbps+ >>>> aggregate in it’s max allowable channel configuration in that band. Great >>>> distance for it. >>>> >>>> Jaime Fink • Mimosa <http://www.mimosa.co> • CPO & Co-Founder >>>> >>>> On July 25, 2016 at 2:18:33 PM, Jaime Solorza ( >>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com) wrote: >>>> >>>> Our county folks have Cisco 4.9Ghz radios but are replacing with 3.65 >>>> GHz due to hundreds of Radwins used across border by state and federal >>>> agencies. I know Airaya had some 4.9GHz ptp solutions.... I know in 5GHz >>>> once they go up they stay up pretty solidly. >>>> >>>> On Jul 25, 2016 2:57 PM, "SmarterBroadband" <li...@smarterbroadband.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We currently provide 100 meg to our local county offices on an AF24. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> They want us to move the link to another location will be a 4.3 mile >>>>> link, so AF24 is out. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I need a link to do 100 meg now and be able to do 200 when requested, >>>>> I want five nines, so Licensed. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can I use 4.9 Ghz for this? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What is available for PTP in 4.9Ghz? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If not, I could use a B11, but I hate to waste 11 Ghz spectrum on a >>>>> short link. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Suggestions in Licensed 18Ghz? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> BTW they are price sensitive. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Adam >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> *Sam Lambie* >>> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >>> 575-758-7598 Office >>> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com> >>> >> >> >> > >
