>public safety agency owns the equipment they can license and only pay coordination costs (no FCC fees)
So when you edit/add the site information on the FCC sites you don't have to pay if it's for government use? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Daniel White <afmu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Adam, > > > > To answer your question, you cannot use 4.9GHz to provide internet > service, regardless of whom the end user is. Commercial traffic cannot > pass over public safety systems (although a 4.9GHz user can distribute the > Internet on their internal network using 4.9GHz). > > > > I’d guess if the tower site was the Demarc, the safety agency had a > contract to lease space on the tower, and you donated the equipment to the > safety agency it would all be kosher. > > > > I’m not a fan of 4.9GHz for most applications personally – remember safety > agencies with higher priority in a disaster can shut down other networks to > prevent interference (for instance, if FEMA moves into an area they can > tell the city to shut down). > > > > Personally I’d use a Part 101 band and be done with it. Once again > though, if the public safety agency owns the equipment they can license and > only pay coordination costs (no FCC fees). So I would lease the equipment > to the customer as part of the broadband services contract. > > > > Daniel White > > Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales > > ConVergence Technologies > > Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 > > dwh...@converge-tech.com > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *SmarterBroadband > *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 3:53 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I... > > > > Good to know, I will take a look. > > Is a county office OK to use 4.9? > > Adam > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Jaime Fink > *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 2:23 PM > *To:* Jaime Solorza; af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I... > > > > B5c in 4.9 GHz is Part 90 Subpart Y certified, should get you 200 Mbps+ > aggregate in it’s max allowable channel configuration in that band. Great > distance for it. > > > > Jaime Fink • Mimosa <http://www.mimosa.co> • CPO & Co-Founder > > > > On July 25, 2016 at 2:18:33 PM, Jaime Solorza (losguyswirel...@gmail.com) > wrote: > > Our county folks have Cisco 4.9Ghz radios but are replacing with 3.65 GHz > due to hundreds of Radwins used across border by state and federal > agencies. I know Airaya had some 4.9GHz ptp solutions.... I know in 5GHz > once they go up they stay up pretty solidly. > > > > On Jul 25, 2016 2:57 PM, "SmarterBroadband" <li...@smarterbroadband.com> > wrote: > > We currently provide 100 meg to our local county offices on an AF24. > > > > They want us to move the link to another location will be a 4.3 mile link, > so AF24 is out. > > > > I need a link to do 100 meg now and be able to do 200 when requested, I > want five nines, so Licensed. > > > > Can I use 4.9 Ghz for this? > > > > What is available for PTP in 4.9Ghz? > > > > If not, I could use a B11, but I hate to waste 11 Ghz spectrum on a short > link. > > > > Suggestions in Licensed 18Ghz? > > > > BTW they are price sensitive. > > > > Thanks > > > > Adam > > > > > > > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> > Virus-free. > www.avast.com > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link> >
