Between Two FRNs. From: Daniel White Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 3:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...
If it is under a government FRN… then there is no license fees. You can’t have the link licensed under your FRN. Daniel White Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales ConVergence Technologies Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 8:57 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I... >public safety agency owns the equipment they can license and only pay >coordination costs (no FCC fees) So when you edit/add the site information on the FCC sites you don't have to pay if it's for government use? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Daniel White <[email protected]> wrote: Adam, To answer your question, you cannot use 4.9GHz to provide internet service, regardless of whom the end user is. Commercial traffic cannot pass over public safety systems (although a 4.9GHz user can distribute the Internet on their internal network using 4.9GHz). I’d guess if the tower site was the Demarc, the safety agency had a contract to lease space on the tower, and you donated the equipment to the safety agency it would all be kosher. I’m not a fan of 4.9GHz for most applications personally – remember safety agencies with higher priority in a disaster can shut down other networks to prevent interference (for instance, if FEMA moves into an area they can tell the city to shut down). Personally I’d use a Part 101 band and be done with it. Once again though, if the public safety agency owns the equipment they can license and only pay coordination costs (no FCC fees). So I would lease the equipment to the customer as part of the broadband services contract. Daniel White Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales ConVergence Technologies Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 [email protected] From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SmarterBroadband Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 3:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I... Good to know, I will take a look. Is a county office OK to use 4.9? Adam From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jaime Fink Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 2:23 PM To: Jaime Solorza; [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I... B5c in 4.9 GHz is Part 90 Subpart Y certified, should get you 200 Mbps+ aggregate in it’s max allowable channel configuration in that band. Great distance for it. Jaime Fink • Mimosa • CPO & Co-Founder On July 25, 2016 at 2:18:33 PM, Jaime Solorza ([email protected]) wrote: Our county folks have Cisco 4.9Ghz radios but are replacing with 3.65 GHz due to hundreds of Radwins used across border by state and federal agencies. I know Airaya had some 4.9GHz ptp solutions.... I know in 5GHz once they go up they stay up pretty solidly. On Jul 25, 2016 2:57 PM, "SmarterBroadband" <[email protected]> wrote: We currently provide 100 meg to our local county offices on an AF24. They want us to move the link to another location will be a 4.3 mile link, so AF24 is out. I need a link to do 100 meg now and be able to do 200 when requested, I want five nines, so Licensed. Can I use 4.9 Ghz for this? What is available for PTP in 4.9Ghz? If not, I could use a B11, but I hate to waste 11 Ghz spectrum on a short link. Suggestions in Licensed 18Ghz? BTW they are price sensitive. Thanks Adam Virus-free. www.avast.com Virus-free. www.avast.com
