If it's dual polarity you won't need 80MHz wide. 40mhz x 2 should be plenty for -most- links.
Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. > On Sep 6, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Look at the page with the spectral analysis. It says 56 MHz produces a 65 - > 79 MHz wide carrier. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > > > > > From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> > To: "af" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:00:23 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 > > 56mhz is what they originally said, but don't the emission designators listed > here indicate it'll do 80mhz? > >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: >> I doubt in the year 2016 ubnt would design/build/ship a product that only >> does 56 MHz ETSI size channels for an FCC/IC market... 60 and 80 are >> allowed now. Coordination results permitting, of course. >> >> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-122A1_Rcd.pdf >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> They're only 56 MHz wide. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>> >>> The Brothers WISP >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:43:38 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 >>> >>> >>> 1024QAM, dual polarity, 80 MHz wide channels? >>> >>> I am hopeful it won't suck. >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> https://fccid.io/SWX-AF11FX >>>> > >
