It's just like a lot of other Ubiquiti (and Mikrotik too). Half-assed. If it was 80 MHz channels and otherwise same specs (now that they added SFP), it could be a great product (pending how their N connector diplexer idea works out). It doesn't, so it could only hope to achieve being a good product.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 9:22:00 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 1024QAM? Depends on the link. Need more margin? Add more dish. On Sep 6, 2016 9:18 PM, "Mathew Howard" < [email protected] > wrote: Sure, it'll be enough for a lot of links, but it won't get you a full gig... On Sep 6, 2016 9:12 PM, "Jon Langeler" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> If it's dual polarity you won't need 80MHz wide. 40mhz x 2 should be plenty for -most- links. Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. On Sep 6, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> Look at the page with the spectral analysis. It says 56 MHz produces a 65 - 79 MHz wide carrier. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Mathew Howard" < [email protected] > To: "af" < [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:00:23 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 56mhz is what they originally said, but don't the emission designators listed here indicate it'll do 80mhz? On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Eric Kuhnke < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> I doubt in the year 2016 ubnt would design/build/ship a product that only does 56 MHz ETSI size channels for an FCC/IC market... 60 and 80 are allowed now. Coordination results permitting, of course. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-122A1_Rcd.pdf On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> They're only 56 MHz wide. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Eric Kuhnke" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:43:38 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AF11 1024QAM, dual polarity, 80 MHz wide channels? I am hopeful it won't suck. On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Josh Reynolds < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> https://fccid.io/SWX-AF11FX </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
