Sure, it'll be enough for a lot of links, but it won't get you a full gig...
On Sep 6, 2016 9:12 PM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote: > If it's dual polarity you won't need 80MHz wide. 40mhz x 2 should be > plenty for -most- links. > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > On Sep 6, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Look at the page with the spectral analysis. It says 56 MHz produces a 65 > - 79 MHz wide carrier. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> > *To: *"af" <[email protected]> > *Sent: *Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:00:23 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF11 > > 56mhz is what they originally said, but don't the emission designators > listed here indicate it'll do 80mhz? > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I doubt in the year 2016 ubnt would design/build/ship a product that only >> does 56 MHz ETSI size channels for an FCC/IC market... 60 and 80 are >> allowed now. Coordination results permitting, of course. >> >> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-122A1_Rcd.pdf >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> They're only 56 MHz wide. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> >>> *To: *[email protected] >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:43:38 PM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF11 >>> >>> >>> 1024QAM, dual polarity, 80 MHz wide channels? >>> >>> I am hopeful it won't suck. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> https://fccid.io/SWX-AF11FX >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > >
