1024QAM? Depends on the link. Need more margin? Add more dish. On Sep 6, 2016 9:18 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sure, it'll be enough for a lot of links, but it won't get you a full > gig... > > On Sep 6, 2016 9:12 PM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If it's dual polarity you won't need 80MHz wide. 40mhz x 2 should be >> plenty for -most- links. >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> On Sep 6, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Look at the page with the spectral analysis. It says 56 MHz produces a 65 >> - 79 MHz wide carrier. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> >> *To: *"af" <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 6, 2016 8:00:23 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF11 >> >> 56mhz is what they originally said, but don't the emission designators >> listed here indicate it'll do 80mhz? >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I doubt in the year 2016 ubnt would design/build/ship a product that >>> only does 56 MHz ETSI size channels for an FCC/IC market... 60 and 80 are >>> allowed now. Coordination results permitting, of course. >>> >>> https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-122A1_Rcd.pdf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> They're only 56 MHz wide. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>> >>>> >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> >>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:43:38 PM >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF11 >>>> >>>> >>>> 1024QAM, dual polarity, 80 MHz wide channels? >>>> >>>> I am hopeful it won't suck. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://fccid.io/SWX-AF11FX >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>
